also wait so this means there are two takeaways from this interactrion right
if he got a result with an odd number of Ts, he rerolled the entire thing, is how I understood it
- dan is lying he is scum
- dan is telling the truth and got roleblocked.
if this is true it also means that fmu missed his roleblock
i wonder who fmu went on
i think we can assume fmu didn't do on dan right? unless he was next lvl mindgaming eod 1.
I think it's nma so all bets are off but I don't see how this is gonna lead us anywhere useful either way
really? i think a pr fake claim, a potential pr fake claim and the targets of the only two town prs we have is pretty important
i think its probably the most important thing of day one.
does roleblock roleblock night kill?
if so then the person fmu went on is likely cleared assuming dan's claim is real
this is because if he roleblocked the roleblocker (assuming TTTT) dan's kill woulda gone through and i'd be dead
and if he roleblocked the killer, there would have been only one nk (me) as the mafia kill woudln't have gone through.
there's no way to find this out and I assume if we had a PR who could know this (never read the full list of PRs) they would've claimed by now
doesn't mean hteres no reason to think about it. might help inform decisions if we read through who he was scum reading and likely woulda targeted.
plus it's not even a lock clear cuz it could be the traitor who has no night action
wait
if they are both telling the truth would it not be BVTTTTT which isn't even an option given re-rolls?
really the most important takeaway is: if we have another pr of the single letter type, they know Dan is likely real vig
it can't be BVTTTTT afik
yea we need to have another pr for his claim to be true. they should prolly just claim if so
i get what youre saying now
yea has to be BVXTTTT or BTTTTTT
if it's BTTTTTT then it's Dan and some partner and no third
1 Like
it'd need to be BVXTTTT
which would imply mafia roleblocker