By your logic scum coulda hammered but didn't so either all scum in the train voting town or all town in the train voting scum
Which of the two do you think it is?
Do you think my N2 investigate makes sense?
Not really
Neither, first two can easily apply pressure by voting, its unlikely for all 3 scum to jump and lynch him quickly. The 3rd was questionable, but LBJ hardcore believes he's scum.
The reason why i'm also saying you're scum is because you had a very logical approach to the game so far, it was really hard to see any issues witch what you were saying, seemed carefully written. That play you made goes against the way a perceived you the entire game though.
I'd expect you to check either me, jdance or nyte
5 players are suspecting him today from their previous reads or lists today. He was a forced mislynch, even if I hit a red today. Should I have investigated you? What if you were town and they did the same thing as N1 with Asoul?
Why didn't you list supas color?
And why did you not hit klaze n2?
If Supa was red I'd have pushed for him (without outing).
Let's presume I don't believe his claim, would it be that illogical to vote for him?
If scum was still uncertain about cop and Klaze was town, my check would be miffed again.
By that logic, why check asoul?
If asoul was town, he would prob die to mafia, if he's mafia and still around then you'd want to see him n2
Your logic just isn't consistent.
Well this all happened before the claim. If you mean that you wouldn't believe the claim regardless then,
- You actually instantly unlynched so that refutes your point
and - Yes I do think its illogical to lynch a cop claim
Let's be clear, I was faking when I said I didn't know why Asoul died, he died because scum wanted him dead (for personal/suspicion reasons), BUT mostly because they thought he'd also maybe be investigated.
Your reasoning for not checking klaze n2 contradicts your logic for checking asoul n1.
If you had the same logic you would have hit someonr like slowdive n2. It's not adding up
I don't want to repeat something that didn't work.
Stop whitenosing the thread with questions about Matticus's earlier actions. Either there's a CC or we believe him.
Look, if I was mafia I would have done the same play as Matt because if I see the pitchforks coming for me, I'm always going to try to make a play to either survive or get information for my team which is fake claiming.
Fake claiming is the play, so his claim is sus, and the real cop not claiming is also common if the checks are dead so they have 0 information to provide
Hence I'm not voting Matt but I'm inquiring for info on his plays and seeing if his logic lines up with the way he's been playing and talking this game.
Yea fair enough, who do you think is the Lynch today if it isn't Matt?