Reminder that this player thinks that we're supposed to believe he's VT and he's lynching "what he suspects" is a N1 convert mask-knitter.
An absolute disaster scenario for town and almost surely a loss.
I never said you were a n1 convert mask knitter
Then I was still town when I claimed? And your whole suspicion on me is because of the claim so far.
IN my mind matticus' plays as mask knitter makes no sense to me, and when I asked him to clarify he wasn't definite in his responses, shifting from one incoherent excuse to another.
So i think you're highly suspect, which leads me to think you're not the mask knitter in the first place.
All of your posts to me were incoherent, including this one. There would have been a cc long ago.
whats a cc
Counterclaim
No counterclaim, because claiming mask knitter AFTER Cop claimed with infected makes no sense
It makes a decent amount of sense in that game state and I've explained why. Look at Klaze (confirmed town) if you need to see proof.
You're explanation why was on the basis of a 1/5 and referencing klaze
The 1/5 is absurd and I've already told you. It's not a dice roll like that because of meta info. There's a lot going on and we wanted the highest chances possible to hit the superspreader.
Even the math on the 1/5 was incorrect since there were up to 3 scum and a cop claim.
Or do you know that there were only 2 scum?
20%, 25% still bad odds
Close to 0% chance you're a VT
Ofcourse you would say that
So you're admitting again that you think I was a N1 convert.
Anyway just reread d2 first ~250 posts when matticus was saying "cop claim was good but everyone else should stay quiet"
Then he asks klaze at post 154 "What's the point in claiming everything if you're just going to lynch kyle though?"
To which Klaze replies "The claiming were to prevent a bad mislynch today, we already got an at worst 1 for 1 lynch."
So if you're going to use klaze as a justification, why would you claim AFTER he clarified what the purpose of a mass claim was?
No I think it was infected fake claim