That’s obviously incorrect.
Lmao these look bad now
Explain.
The “obvious safe lynch” is agubar
Yet you’re willing to sperg out on me over just wrong claims that I don’t sus you and haven’t interacted etc.
Fucking ridiculous
The obvious safe lynch between Agubar and Ewiz, if they are suspected partners, is Agubar.
The obvious safe lynch is agubar, because them being partners is less likely.
Making agubar a “safe” lynch because 3p will hurt town when he’s fucking outted d1 and a liability.
Which you REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE
I was specifically talking about what Dan pushed for, and you to some extent. Dan was saying that Ewiz and Agubar were scum partners.
But your own logic HINGES on it
There are other players in the game not lynching Agubar, and yet you focus in on me. Somehow that makes me your top lynch.
I even explained why, and you didn’t have much to say about it until now.
I believe 1 scum voted elsewhere (or didn’t vote) and one scum sat on agubar with no intention of remaining there should it look like he were actually going to be lynched. It is NOT in scums interest AT ALL to lynch 3p or remove his wincon from the game. Outing day 1 makes him much less likely to band with town.
“Stop scumhunting and everyone train on Agubar or you’re scum.”
It’s a fine last resort lynch. But telling everyone to train on him will end the day early.
Also this is false. I focused on you for your overall play and disregard for my read requests.
And this is counter to your earlier “day 1 low effort” approach. Who cares if d1 ends with a safe lynch for town? That’s anti town thinking.
I had already posted that I thought the push on ewiz was scummy. I started questioning Iaafr, Klaze, Dan, and you. I hadn’t sorted it out yet.
You asking for read requests just felt off after that.
nyte if u can stop accusing ur fellow townies of being 3p that would be epic