Trump vs Harris debate September 10

Jones uses light mode on namafia as a weird contrarian stance.

1 Like

He swaps over to it for screenshots as a bit. I'm onto his bullshit

2 Likes

Yes but bitches using it as a form of birth control that's the issue.

And I appreciate your honesty. That's really the two worlds we are fighting over. One side wants a world where women must risk pregnancy to have sex and the other wants a world where women can have sex without always necessarily risking pregnancy by using birth control and even abortions under the right circumstances.

When I look at these two sides, one sounds like some weirdos afraid of women that have sex, and the other side wants the world to be normal and not force women to have to choose between giving birth and celibacy.

1 Like

"Using it as a form of birth control" is one of the most made-up male chauvinist fantasy lines of reasoning on the issue out there. Possibly holds the top spot. It's a place you can only arrive at after stacking up a pile of simply ■■■■■■■■ ideas about how people you do not know live their lives

1 Like

Another example of male fantasy I've just observed online.

What are your opinions on the death penalty?

You thinking that is likely more a result of you being a porn-brained freak. The missive of "abortion is immoral and I don't care" into that lmao

I'd posit that the men in this thread that are "supporting abortion" are doing it under the guise that women will only have sex with them if they have the option of aborting their low-value offspring away.

I don't have a strong opinion on it, but I lean against it because of the number of wrong convictions involving the death penalty that get thrown around. But I haven't looked into how real those numbers are and could be convinced that we should have a death penalty.

are you suggesting that a stance of pro choice = anti abortion/the narrative that abortion is a means of birth control isn't explicitly sexist in origin?

ultra brain bad

No I'm saying that increasing the risk of having to carry a child of of low-value men to term reduces the chance of sex for low-value men.

It's rather simple: if the risks are higher than the payoff must rise in order for people to play.

And anti-abortion weirdos are too self conscious about how they stack up against a woman's past sexual partners.

that's a weird take that i don't think alleged "low value" men would even be privy to

It's not my fault you don't understand.

anti abortionist 100% can be and often are brainwashed women, unfortunately

not my fault you apparently didn't understand what i said?

Anyone thinking about their offspring's genetic "value" and how satisfied their wife would be with it belongs in a straight jacket.

I'd posit that the men in this thread that are "supporting abortion" are doing it under the guise that women will only have sex with them if they have the option of aborting their low-value offspring away.

You're posting non-sequitors at me.