Voter thread 2024

I was "raped" in the same manner as these Epstein victims at age 16 -- it never occurred to me that perpetrator was actually an alien-human hybrid, an ethereal being, or a ghost.

Just simping for BPD, psychotic women.

@TheOldLegendNumeta they talkin shit

Foolish

1 Like

How do you feel about Harvey Weinstein? If you like him I’d check out Scream. Good movie

Doesn't Nyte believe some crazy UFO shit? What a coincidence.

Harvey Weinstein is obviously innocent. Like Gavin Newsome's wife has accused him of raping her. It was obviously all made up.

I dunno man maybe this is how it feels to be the left wing version of the sandy hook guys. Those videos with him with women or how they reacted when they were asked about him seemed like evidence enough

Harvey Weinstein's 'abnormal' genitals are focus of final arguments

But in the final hours of the case, the former movie producer’s abnormal testicles emerged as a key piece of evidence on which the jury will have to deliberate when they determine whether he is guilty of rape and sexual assault.

You're reading this now in 2025 and you're telling me this wasn't a complete farce.

What’s the motive? To play David vs Goliath in a game of bearing what you believe to be is probably your biggest mistake or regret or “if I coulda avoided” moment

During her testimony, Jane Doe #1 spoke at length about Weinstein’s testicles. On the stand, she tearfully told the jury that Weinstein demanded she “suck his balls,” or forced her to perform oral sex on him. Rehashing the graphic details, she said, “He forced me to do what he asked I was crying, choking.” But during cross-examination, one of Weinstein’s attorneys, Alan Jackson, asked Jane Doe #1 how Weinstein’s “balls were in your mouth,” if he does not have testicles.

“The reason that you changed your story is because you realised at some point that Mr. Weinstein does not have testicles in his scrotum, Jackson said to Jane Doe #1 during her three-day testimony. She disagreed and said she never changed her story, and always told detectives that Weinstein had abnormal testicles.”

I don’t know those women but there are plenty of successful females in that realm that don’t have anything to gain from bearing the public brunt of their victimhood and are pretty obviously one. The woman from the resident evil franchise is one example of a situation where “nothing happened” but something was obviously wrong and did happen

Do you know anything about women? You're telling me that women, who decide to become ACTRESSES aren't batshit insane?

The women who MOVE TO HOLLYWOOD to BECOME BIG MOVIE STARS aren't CRAZY and have NOTHING TO GAIN FROM ACCUSING THE MOST PROMINENT PRODUCER IN HOLLYWOOD THAT THEY RAPED HER?

It’s a horseshoe anyway if it were true who are we to judge when we’re in the male cesspit colosseum of sanity

Yeah we’re definitely sane as fuck up in here

Who are we to judge -- referring to the contents of a court case brought forth in a jury trial.

Dan is the type of guy who believed Amber Heard in the Johnny Depp trial.

1 Like

Your case against women: 1 nyte and these abused anecdotes

My anecdotal case against men: the wide arrange of sanity on display on this very site. We have a Dominican Nazi who believes he’s taking on the NYlluminati.

And if he said he was raped by his house super would you believe him LMAO

1 Like

You just typed some shit about women who self select to TRY TO BECOME MOVIE STARS having no reason to LIE. THESE PEOPLE are INSANE by and LARGE