The Trump Administration has been an absolute success besides the H1Bs and the failure to deport people in a meaningful way but it wasn't reasonable for him to absolutely cross the rubicon and abolish the constitution.
Be the change you want to see, I'll never agree with you but by default you are slightly above those too apathetic to engage in the process but don't cease to complain about it.
The Golden Dome is ■■■■■■■■ LMAO
I'm a high-agency political actor. I'm not like morons like @ilmemmerdelui who roleplay as a sardonic chapotard online and post dirtbag leftist drivel and then vote for Kamala Harris on command.
I wouldn't have voted for Nikki Haley. I would have pushed for Vivek to be shot.
I wouldn't have voted for Ron Desantoid
@ilmemmerdelui would have been a good cumtown listener and voted for Corey Booker Hillary Clinton Michelle Obama Joe Biden Pete BootyGay Gretchen Whitmer Shapiro Beshar and last of all Kamala Harris like the completely complex political being he is.
2 party system is ultimately flawed, but we are a long ways from doing anything about it.
Me, I would have voted for Vance (Not Running) and Trump -- that's it, bar the entrance of some even more insane right wing hitler like candidate who would be preferable over Trump
Can't believe this ■■■■■■ called me a pseudo intellectual
Didn't say anything about ranked choice, but carry on.
why do you think that more than two political parties can exist in a plurality voting scheme -- the optimal behavior is to merge with another party until there are only two left.
im griefing dude. lmao
That is large part of the problem I alluded to, perhaps as it appears to be in your case you feel strongly about some key issues regarding what feels like heavy handed interference through government intervention. Though in order to support that you have to cosign a whole host of things you may not agree with, it's no different on the other side of the aisle. Personally I do not feel our two remaining political parties are equal and opposite forces.
That being said, I would like to extend a sort of acknowledgement that it is unfair that much of the discourse around social equity programs seeks to minimize and disregard your personal struggle. It may even attempt to silence you because of factors you never had any choice in. It really sucks, and it ultimately feels like it goes against some of what this country has claimed to be.
I'm glad you're doing better, and feel your vote was towards something you believe in that has actively benefited you. Though on that train of thought perhaps the Kamala voters you rail against, would've personally benefited from that vote and therefore are equally valid in doing so. Ignoring any external possibilities of empathy or voting against something you see as worse for a more general populace.
These are not social equity programs -- no one who owns a company which is a supplier on a missile defense system, a hypersonic weapon, a spaceship is in need of "leveling of their social equity" -- they are handout programs; it is patronage to a specific class of people at the discrimination of others.
democratic politics is entirely transactional -- you vote yourself a chance of stealing from the state's coffers if you end up winning. It doesn't really have anything to do with policy at this point. It's why the country is 40 trillion dollars in debt.
it's why democracy should be totally shelved and we need a dictator king to fix the country for the next 30 years
You vote for your specific affinity group to receive handouts from the government -- it's just that white men are not as overt about it as minorities.