https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/?baa=DOD_SBIR_2025_P1_C4
I might put together a proposal for A254-006
War gaming with machine learning this shit is going to get people killed
I have never once in my life seen someone do something they say they "might" do
Youre just larping dude
Well it depends on if I become unemployed in 3 weeks.
Yeah I don’t think he’ll do any of this either but at least he’s looking at it and I’m proud of him for at least thinking of doing something nowadays
the problem is I know who the proposal is written for already
The problem is definitely not that
Theres no problem you either want money or you dont
Any problem you have is you making one up to rationalize not doing something
no, that's how these things work.
Is marie your mtf name?
1 Like
you should put together the proposal.
Putting together proposals sounds gay why don’t you just do something else
You’re gonna propose to another man? Fa g
based on what I'm reaidng alghtsou I've already chosen the cheapest provider out of pure luck. 
I spent over 8000 dollars on doordash this year and almost all of it was from the same mexican restaurant
1 Like
In 2021 I think I was spending 2k a month on Postmates
Its addicting somehow
Yeah you don’t have to cook just throw away the bag when you’re done it’s the easiest shit ever
Really great for my lazy ass
The Army uses "terrain shaping" to impede enemy movement or operations. Terrain-shaping operations also help the mobility and survivability of friendly forces. Currently, the Army uses cannon-fired or air-dropped anti-tank mines to shape the deep maneuver area of the battlefield, which is 70km+ beyond the FLOT. The systems the Army currently uses to conduct terrain-shaping operations, while still broadly effective, are aging and resource intensive to emplace. Additionally, while current US anti-personnel landmine policy does not prevent the use of cannon-fired or air-dropped anti-tank mines, the policy does restrict to the Korean peninsula the use of current systems using anti-personnel mines. This restriction prevents current systems from being a world-wide solution for terrain shaping.
The Army is seeking deep terrain shaping obstacles (DTSO) that will delay, deter, and deny enemy forces 70–150km+ beyond the FLOT. DTSO solutions should delay operational maneuver through restricting terrain to defeat/destroy or to gain space/time, deny use of or access to key terrain/facilities, and deter operational movement of enemy forces. Technology solutions that contribute to one or more DTSO tasks are of particular interest. Solutions that will be considered, but not limited to, are the following:
Uncrewed systems capable of forming obstacles to shape existing terrain, affecting the adversary's ability to maneuver
Uncrewed systems that can position multiple explosive loitering munitions
Uncrewed systems that can position themselves in the deep battlespace and activate when a threat is identified
Lethal or non-lethal effectors initiated from behind the front line to impact enemy maneuver in the deep fight (70–150km+)
Integration of remote sensing and lethal effectors at machine speed with human-in-the-loop to approve lethal action
Solutions should allow Soldiers to conduct terrain-shaping operations 70km+ beyond the FLOT. This may include technology solutions that can be employed by air or ground uncrewed systems or launched from a safe distance. If the solution includes a lethal munition it must be able to classify an/or discriminate between types of targets.
The Army desires flexibility in future terrain shaping methods. Solutions should incorporate the ability to be controlled (activated/deactivated) from behind the frontline. However, solutions with the potential to be controlled from behind the frontline will be considered. Ideally, solutions should be scalable for use depending on the desired effect on enemy maneuver (disrupt, turn, fix, or block).
1 Like