lmao you make the case for your insane bias. can't make this up.
Respond to this one. Do you disagree with any of it?
If the user here was Benny and not Nyte it would be a ban honestly.
Honestly -> blatant lie
I think I am mostly interested in soft power.
For example: Do you work at a company? Who controls that company?
Did you live in a normal household growing up? Who controlled the household?
And any comments on the fact that one party has nominated two completely incompetent candidates in the past 10 years or so and expected both of them to be voted in solely because they are women?
If women had so little power this would be a foolish and auto-losing strategy.
Which woman candidate would you vote for president
all that needs to be said:
assoul approved (and self posted) image
** "All this over a post removal that you know has someone else's picture in it. I'll remove posts with other people's pictures intended to make fun of them all day. This is what I mean about h o n e s t y." **
Allow me to mansplain her argument a bit to you, she is I think alluding in the removed post that jones behavior to her is similar to a crazy stalker shit from the news. The argument more recently isn't that you condone those actions, nor are pro-stalker. Though that a general complacency and laissez-faire attitudes towards certain behaviors is extremely troubling to someone of her background. Essentially it allows it to happen through bystander effect, inaction. Though she is extremely passionate about it, and feels its never taken seriously enough. Which completes the loop for her confirming that you affirming your complacency/bias.
1 Like
The truth is that culture is not monolithic. We live within several sub-spheres of culture at all times - there are different cultures across the US and in different social and political circles.
And men are not monolithic. I think there is a sort of rush-to-the-extremes in men where a small number of men are concentrated in positions of high power but a much larger majority of men are essentially a downtrodden underclass - taking roles like plumber, construction worker, website moderator and just doing their best to scrape by while being the targets for endless and uncompromising abuse from all corners of society.
Let me put it simply. If we take the statistics of men vs women and instead assigned some different social group - black people vs asians for example - it would be widely considered to be evidence of severe systemic racism and discrimination. In fact, one of the leading indicators in the systemic racism system of beliefs is the prevalence of incarceration among black people. Why is that statistical disparity evidence of systemic discrimination when it is examined in a racial context, but the same statistic even more severely expressed (incarceration rates of men vs women) completely discarded and not taken seriously as a system of societal prejudice against men?
This, I think, is a serious issue that deserves more discussion when Jones and YNS log on.
Tulsi Gabbard
Marianne Williamson
maybe or maybe not Liz Warren idk
No idea on the right as I don't really pay attention to right wing candidates
Worth noting that Jones wasn't actually posting at Nyte at this time, he was mostly ignoring her.
Like with Jdance posting, Nyte will post several times in the thread an inflammatory post directed at a specific person until it gets the response she desires. This response is then used as evidence that the initial targeted harassment was justified.
I'm glad we could turn this into the NADota Sexism Thread
One of the greatest threads of this website's history
I disagree with this new redefining of the terms sexism and racism in that there is a power component to it, this is some recent development that was taught to people in college but to me being racist and sexist doesn’t require an aspect of power at all. If you’re discriminatory towards people because of their gender you are a sexist regardless of any larger power dynamic within society.
That shit is just an excuse so people can go off into their groups of what they define as being disadvantaged, do exactly the thing they’re claiming to fight against, but excuse it because they don’t have power in society or whatever other nonsense
Anyways Nyte that picture of me used in that came from my Instagram I believe and I’m not whining about it
The first few lines of questions I find confusing, as I'm not sure my answers lead to your point.
I think it is funny, because you could argue that for the other party as well.
That being said I find it hard to argue either of them wasn't qualified for the position, even if they aren't likable their resumes' surely would both be better than trump's. Incompetent is a bit of a rough one to rationalize when they both ran pretty mediocre campaigns, and against the same candidate who doesn't really line up with a typical candidate or campaign.
I would never vote for a woman because in my own life I’ve never met a woman who I felt would be more capable then a man
Not all men but if you take a man and a woman and put them through the same life circumstances the man will always be better
The U.S. Department of Justice estimates that 95% of reported assaults on spouses or ex-spouses are committed by men.
Studies have found that men are responsible for 80% to 95% of child sexual abuse cases.
A 2013 UN study found that men are responsible for 95% of homicides globally.
"To study the potential differences that distinguish homicides involving women as victims or offenders from those involving men, we analyzed Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports data on homicides that occurred in the United States between 1976 and 1987. Only cases that involved victims aged 15 years or older were included. Persons killed during law enforcement activity and cases in which the victim's gender was not recorded were excluded. A total of 215,273 homicides were studied, 77% of which involved male victims and 23% female victims. Although the overall risk of homicide for women was substantially lower than that of men (rate ratio [RR] = 0.27), their risk of being killed by a spouse or intimate acquaintance was higher (RR = 1.23). In contrast to men, the killing of a woman by a stranger was rare (RR = 0.18). More than twice as many women were shot and killed by their husband or intimate acquaintance than were murdered by strangers using guns, knives, or any other means. Although women comprise more than half the U.S. population, they committed only 14.7% of the homicides noted during the study interval. In contrast to men, who killed nonintimate acquaintances, strangers, or victims of undetermined relationship in 80% of cases, women killed their spouse, an intimate acquaintance, or a family member in 60% of cases. When men killed with a gun, they most commonly shot a stranger or a non-family acquaintance."
In fact I’ve never met a woman I thought was smart
violence itself is one good indicator for incarceration issues.
1 Like