Defeat the Cathedral by doing exactly what the Cathedral would like you to do. In fact, let's donate to Democratic political causes and suck off the NYT interviewer under the table. That will really show them!
He wasn't there to debate -- he was there to do some erudite 3 hour interview and exasperate the interviewer. They literally called him back and then just started attacking him on "Wimenz Rights".
Business strategy: Our competitors have some flaws in their product. If we just wait/do nothing, eventually their product might fail or someone else will come along and replace their product. This is how we'll win. I'm a very smart businessman and want to implement this strategy for governments.
What internal forces are going to destabilize the US? Should we form a militia? Should we take and hold pieces of land and demand ourselves sovereign?
See above. "I'm going to start a competing government while in the Soviet Union reign of terror".
Yarvin's main point in the followup interview was "I was trolling when I said that other stuff, I'm sorry, please don't take my early work seriously"
This guy is going to parlay this into a speaking circuit of various "Cathedral" organizations and then a 10 year career being a talking head on the TV and you guys will all be on Twitter saying "No, actually, he's defeating them"
No that's Richard Hanania and Chris Rufo.
Yarvin does this for pussy and that's it. His wife died and he got married to a professional BDSM practitioner for like 9 months and then that fell apart.
The point is that reform and incremental improvement is significantly more effective - always. Your best chance at a decent government in the US is to embrace the electoral process, vote someone in who is actually capable/intelligent, and hope he does a few good things before the end of his term.

No that's Richard Hanania and Chris Rufo.
Yarvin does this for pussy and that's it. His wife died and he got married to a professional BDSM practitioner for like 9 months and then that fell apart.
Everybody does this. All of these guys want just this. It's all the same thing.
"I have been an internet political commentator trying to make my voice heard for so long - if you would please just invite me into the Cathedral, I could earn the respect of my peers and a little speckle of pussy"
These guys would be better off taking up dancing. Leave all this political stuff behind. Plenty of pussy for everybody here
no, the type of pussy that Yarvin wants does not frequent the NYT.
Inaccurate. The type of pussy Yarvin can get does not frequent the NYT.

The point is that reform and incremental improvement is significantly more effective - always. Your best chance at a decent government in the US is to embrace the electoral process, vote someone in who is actually capable/intelligent, and hope he does a few good things before the end of his term.
Just the most brain dead low IQ take I have ever read. It's easier to collapse the entire thing than get "capable/intelligent" people into the government en-masse and then have them make "incremental changes" that will somehow shift the USG into being coherent.
Anyway, I've taken a Vow of Celibacy in 2025 (retention improves dancing) so I will not be engaging with this Yarvin NYT stuff anymore if he is a known fakecel.
Yeah, we should just populate the Californian government with "smart/capable" people and it will sort itself out. Are you insane? This is boomer slop LMAO
What incentive does a "capable/intelligent" person have to enter the government? National service? LMAO
You want to be paid on the GS schedule and live in Washington, DC?
All it takes is one person making one decision to permanently alter the course of history.
Example: Reagan completely ruining California for 40 years by signing an act to legalize a massive voting bloc of illegal immigrants who then proceeded to Vote Blue No Matter Who and run the state into the ground

What incentive does a "capable/intelligent" person have to enter the government? National service?
Patriotism. Improving his country for himself, his loved ones, and his fellow Americans.
And you've found another problem -- half of these things are a ratchet and can't be turned back. It'd be massively beneficial to remove enfranchisement from women in the US -- this can never be done "incrementally".
You should note that the ONE FUNCTION of the government that can do things like this, the CONSERVATIVES control already.
Here's a question -- what if we try to "incrementally" change the US for the next 50 years. Say, we are actively lending our support to the regime.
That's 50 more years of accumulating and importing biotrash.
Let's say we all agree the US is over and collapses into anarchy tomorrow -- all of these people will just leave almost immediately.