Well it depends. There are spies that influence the opponent from within and spies that collect information. From what I gather (as a Spy myself), the latter is a lot more common.
However one can make a spy out of themselves in essence, in many ways. Is this what you're saying? That she made herself into a spy, for free, not specifically hired by the Turkish/Whatever government?
I'm saying that the only reason for her to be here is literally to be a foreign agent. the most impactful thing she's done is literally advocated for changes in US policy.
There's no difference between ethnic cleansing and genocide, it's a semantics trick
Using first result from google, 4 of 5 conditions for genocide are immediately satisfied
What does ‘genocide’ technically mean?
The United Nations first defined genocide in 1948 in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The treaty outlines five acts that can constitute genocide if they are done “with the intent to destroy an ethnic, national, racial or religious group”:
Killing members of the group
Causing serious bodily or mental harm
Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the group’s physical destruction in whole or in part
I see. So in other words, she might as well be a spy because otherwise she's something even worse - a negative person, a leech on all societies with no value.
However, what if a PhD Computer Science/Engineering/Medicine/STEM Researcher came to your country and advocated for let's say Pro-Chinese foreign policy change? Would it be the same?
That person is a lot more valuable that the fake degree Hijab lady, but arguably might be of even more influence in regards to foreign policy.
You really live in a fantasy land where palestinians are being pleasantly asked to leave their homes and some ■■■■■■ foreign phd student is in the country as a spy to influence foreign policy