"illegal conversations" thought you believed in free speech
I wasnt aware that free speech applies to top secret intel
The US said it wasn't top secret info though.
Just say that you apply standards differently depending on if one candidate is representing your surrogate father figure
By congrssional record, it isn't. It's not illegal conversations.
You literlaly said it wasn't top secret info.
Yes they lied about that (perjury) it automatically fits top secret level clearance laid out in the rules and framework that they swore under oath to obey
"it automatically fits"..
no it doesn't. It wasn't produced in a SCIF or anything like that.
If it was top secret why was it being discussed over public internet
Again, all you have to say is you think thatbrhey should be able to do whatever they want. You dont need to twist reality here. We are past that
You are so close
I think they do whatever tehy want
1 Like
So its fascism then
Using Signal - Fascism.
That is correct
but Signal was anti-fascist a decade ago.
Just admit that Signal became fascist when it leaks that Pete Hegseth used it 48 hours ago.
Don't argue with a gay dragon it's gay
I actually love seeing leftist PhD foreigners getting snatched off the street and spirited away for deportation. I relish it. I love it. I could care less if I have ZOG to thank for it or not. It gets me hard. I’m drinking beers and I might pop on Glengarry Glen Ross. Fuck you.
Yeah thats fine. You can think that. Just be honest instead of some workaround logical framework you are trying to solicit people into