there is no real reason why they shouldnt be.
There should be notes of the conversation and a record that the conversation took place
how detailed should the notes be.
100% detailed and they should require a top secret clearance to read
they soguld just be recorded and automaticlaly transcirbd.
Preferably a journalist shouldnt be able to read them. And then after the journalist reads them it shouldnt be said that they were "not top secret" so that they can be leaked to the public
But that just makes sense in my little brain.
actually journalists should be able to rad them in the interst of transparnce.y
Ironic coping.
journalists are the few class of peopl ewho can get away with illegally obtained TS (teamspeak) logs.
what goldberg did was illegal.
did he sign in on the log with his time in and time out when he joined the signal chat? did he denote that he was a US citizen?
you can actually have uncleared people in SCIFs as long as you tuen on the little siren light.
Why would he need go do that? The info didnt have a security clearance
it was a secure group chat and you have to sign in/out.
again, they could have turned on the little red ambulance light while uncleared people were in the room.
Seems to me that the signal application took care of that whole sign in process then
another quesion: is Goldberg cleared?
Why didnt they?
they might have. Goldberg might have snuck into the room through the help of a foreign adversary.