Archaic? Are you going to call mathematics archaic next?
The system can understand who you will and will not get on with before you have even interacted as sometimes it takes multiple threads to see who your enemy personalities are.
I am not twisting your words at all. You are saying my mental illness is being baited by me for attention. I donât do that at all.
Psychology is a much less objective science than mathematics.
Anyways I canât believe I took that bait from brendan earlier. My bad benny.
No I am not saying that. I am saying you canât help mentioning it because you canât handle being thought of as a normal person and your narcissism requires you to collect attention from everyone around you.
Neither of those things are true.
It is not, otherwise it would be thought of in the same realm as something like chiropracty. You are picking and choosing what is a real science to fit your ideas of yourself.
Not sure what this is referring to. Is it ironic?
Youâre again in denial. These things are as true as twice two makes four and you canât just dismiss it by saying psychology isnât an objective science.
No the thing where I said Jungâs typology work was archaic and then Nmagane said that I would call the entirety of mathematics into question.
I never said it wasnât objective. Itâs not as concrete as math.
I donât see Bigot on the Jungian Archetype Wheel
Glad I told someone off and then let myself argue again. Shit.
This isn't correct its wrong
Why would I use a typology wheel
Yes of course - itâs only concrete in the areas that donât directly and accurately describe your personality flaws
Psychology sees a lot more inherent, illogical biases than mathematics does.
yo benny whats ur job? and why do you consider yourself an artist?
You think thatâs bait why?