Until then I mean go ahead and say "who cares if you're stupid and get owned" and "yeah that's business you will get preyed upon" but I don't think those are good for the longterm at all. the people and businesses that do these things are just basically pissing in the piss pool that is the economy and saying "fuck it everyone else is doing it"
theres gonna be some point where we're encumbered & disgusted & getting selectively owned and not really getting as much swimming done, if any
and this stuff is ignoring the fact that the world economy is probably gonna be shuddered for quite a while and pretty much anything that has economic self-incentive to grow new (hopefully useful) markets and create addtl commerce in existing ones is a net good for us, we can worry about cutting the crypto fat later when we're good and ready
It's rather obvious: there is a TPM, tamper-proof chip on the car that runs diagnostics and can determine when a part was "replaced" or not.
If you don't have the technical knowledge to come up with this, it's unlikely you have much to say in regards to the "technical feasibility" of solutions on the blockchain.
Is this a joke? Do you know what an "oppressive dictatorship" even means? It's not a secret, otherwise you wouldn't be calling it an oppressive dictatorship, you'd be calling it The United States of America.
What is a Sybil Attack. In regards to implementation: breaking ECDLP, exploiting implementation flaws (that have mostly been within smart contract implementations).
"Imagine if we could do (insert good thing) on this platform. We could do (insert good thing). It's based because of the limitless opportunities to (do good thing)."
the continued usage of "students", "studying", "doing the work": consider a toy market that is 50/50 coin flips, all luck. the winners are "good students" or something, the losers aren't "studying". moreover, there's a survivorship bias with all of the people hitting balance of $0 (or whatever they've defined as a barrier) removing themselves from the pool.
extreme amounts of jargon: little to no mathematical underpinnings (?).
is the usage of "mentorship" and phrasing things in terms of pedagogy a tool to get around the regulations for scamming idiots?
