i specified R. R is the real numbers. do you have some kind of contention over the natural ordering usually-used ordering of the real numbers?
you absolut bafoons
Destroy? An individual would go break the windows of, say, a bank. Seize? The individuals would go and occupy a factory, keeping it running and producing but keeping the products of the labor and splitting them equally among themselves.
"strictly defining words" is just another form of bullying people out of the conversation because you can misdefine/misunderstand a concept and completely avoid having the conversation at all - but also convince some nimwits you're intelligent in doing it
For example - when I talked about how he was discrediting people not by engaging their ideas but by labeling them as some "Other" and he quoted a bunch of shit about how the capital O Other means xyz and it doesn't count as what he's doing or whatever.
- it was wrong
- who cares
- what a waste of time
what do you do with all the steel you have split equally among yourselves?
Because the factors of mutual aid make it such that benefits society the most and benefits you the most
If you respond to any of it you get to have an endless discussion about definitions instead of discussing the topic at hand
Where's your data showing I'm wrong? All the data shows I'm right
So you disagree with what's going on but can't see why you'd need violence or destruction to stop these people. What's your plan? Not pay your parking tickets? Write a stern letter?
What's yours? Burn down local businesses and attack cops with IEDs?
You use the steel as fuel for the jet fuel
Destroy it all the systems and the people in the systems and The people outside the systems and the non people
Hard restart asap
How are the people in the systems destroyed? What do you do?
catch them cook them eat them and then yourself
I don't like when people post glibly non-specific defenses of violence. If you're going to advocate violence say "I think it is justified to burn down and loot all the businesses in Chicago" or whatever
Ah, yes, to endorse revolutionary violence is the same as endorsing all violence. You are very smart
but the change between me working hard and not working hard has very low impact overall on society when split among everybody. i argue that in many cases this change is smaller than the benefit i selfishly get from slacking off. and when everybody else is working hard and life is good, maybe i innocuously might want to slack off a bit because i really dont think its a big deal! but what if everybody thinks that way...?
Destroy? An individual would go break the windows of, say, a bank. Seize? The individuals would go and occupy a factory, keeping it running and producing but keeping the products of the labor and splitting them equally among themselves.
How does breaking the windows of a bank change anything? How do you keep a factory running once you've seized and occupied it?
Do you know it's 2020? Who even works in a factory any more?
principled reasons (asoul seems to claim so; dont think hbotz necessarily does)
Hbotz has explicitly acknowledged his reasons aren't, which is still better than pretending they are
catch them cook them eat them and then yourself
Glibly advocating cannibalism then
But when the chips are down it's real advocacy for real violence
Stage 1 whoever catches the most people wins
Stage 2 whoever survives the longest eating oneself wins
The thing you missed was that I was opposed to police violence before you even had heard of the issue.
Opposed, yet content to do nothing to change it and criticize those who work to actually create meaningful change