yeah what you miss is there's also a rational element
If you say you're fine having your house burned down because it serves a moral purpose, of course I am going to point out that is irrational and completely divorced from reality
you can sit here and theorycraft about nonviolence all you want but the reality is the violence I'm objecting to is wrapped up in a broken, irrational, and poisonous ideology which is as deserving of condemnation as the violence itself
Not everything is racism. Not everything is class based. Marx even wrote on how the positionality of race with respect to chattel slavery was out of the scope of class analysis
At night is when the cops show up and mass arrest peaceful protestors you bootlicking fuck. You don't give a shit about racism or police brutality as you've proven over and over again
you simply aren't thinking long and hard enough about these things.
you are against "violence" (that you don't even understand) and you are for "law and order" that is an agent for violence. it's about controlling resources. and if you'll remember, i recently mentioned that morals are a different kind of resource - but one nonetheless. ones which could be equated to human rights. and when you rob people of these rights, you're doing violence and destruction on them.
i already know how broken your thinking is - you've said things like "is it really that bad to live that way if they were happy"
newsflash, you could apply the same argument to slaves. and i'm sure people DID.
it's wrong. you aren't really about upholding values, just your comforts.
What about intersectional analysis of oppression poisons the dialogue? You just mad that your status as a white cis-man is diminished by focusing on the oppressed? Seems like it given how you jack off to those IDW dumbfucks
You ever want to quote where that woman talked about her kids' experiences? What about whatever she discussed that was "racial garbage?" You really went full mask-off today
Hey, want to explain how it's not true that nonviolent movements can only gain legitimacy through their accompanying violent movements? Want to explain how the system can be reformed without throwing the Constitution out of the window given the dozen SCOTUS decisions I cited and explained over this thread?
Fuck, you can't even explain why the ideology is poisonous. "It otherized the rich when you take away private property!" is not a fucking answer because it's a defensive action responding to the economic violence inflicted by the capitalist class
Did you see where hbotz said he'd have been a Nazi in Germany because he prefers order over justice if his life is fine? That was the best part. Or maybe his "well, ackshually, sweatshops are good for the people who work in them" tirade