No, I think they could be some undergrad grasping for something and failing. Much like the reviewer that's quoted in the article did. It looks like the work of someone in a nascent stage in their field that doesn't really have a good idea, but maybe could be guided to something
okay. so by that standard you would say that stuff reading as "undergrad's incomplete project" might end up published in other fields as well, and therefore this incident is not particularly mysterious?
Brief: If straight men were to anally penetrate themselves with sex toys, they would become less transphobic and more feminist.
Bad evidence: The "evidence" was interviews with 13 men, only 8 of them straight. Including one "social conservative" whose interview consisted of him saying he didn't want to participate in some "stupid liberal study about sticking things up his butt."
Timestamp 47:00 in the JBP interview in which these 3 discuss these papers
So is Jordan Peterson good or bad
Irrelevant question, info doesn't become false because it's coming from someone who you've labeled a Nazi because he said it was wrong to codify modern gender pronouns into Canadian law
In dogshit journals, yes. Every field has this issue
Is Jordan Peterson a Nazi? Who is the Nazi?
What's codify? Spotify for coders?
agreed. did the hoaxing results publish in weak journals? i ask this because i do not know.
Did I start this line of discussion?
Yes
Anyways point of all this is something has gone seriously wrong with our sense-making apparatus when supposedly reasonable and educated people are believing and supporting these things
Yes I believe the flight of reason should be studied and understood. Maybe it's a little far to joke about putting ewiz in a padded room and examining his head and I appreciate you guys checking me on that stuff. But I think the point stands that some of this stuff really makes very little sense and it's important to understand why these ideas have taken so many people in, especially on the internet/twitter
Yes, listen to asoul, the guy who has no idea what any of these fields study or are about. Some shit things getting published in chaff journals totally discredits the fields
He actually knows a lot about everything
What's that? You want to criticize Going in Through the Back Door: Challenging Straight Male Homohysteria, Transhysteria, and Transphobia Through Receptive Penetrative Sex Toy Use ?
I'll bet you haven't even read Going in Through the Back Door: Challenging Straight Male Homohysteria, Transhysteria, and Transphobia Through Receptive Penetrative Sex Toy Use .
1 Like
Can you really criticize Going in Through the Back Door: Challenging Straight Male Homohysteria, Transhysteria, and Transphobia Through Receptive Penetrative Sex Toy Use if you haven't tried to anally penetrate yourself to become less transphobic and more feminist?
1 Like
At least he can use the "I have him blocked" excuse when he just blatantly strawmans every argument now. Maybe that'll make him look less stupid
this but unironically
Are you even trying to not be transphobic? To understand women's experiences? Stop posting right now and go shove something up your ass.