Now try to imagine someone on the forum that's actually gay reading that post, taking it as a legitimately homophobic comment and creates a "Homophobia on NAMafia" thread and we have a pretty identical scenario to what panned earlier (not saying he is necessarily in the wrong)
Adding a tip to a drunk persons order hoping they don't realize it a few days later is a gamble I have never lost
If he’s not wrong then what’s the issue?
While he is not exactly wrong, he is still taking a lighthearted joke with little to no malicious intent and blowing it out of proportion
Homophobic
1 Like
reading books is cool there is nothing wrong with reading books
its about telling people to read books
god why is my reading comprehension so much better than everybody elses
reading books is cool there is nothing wrong with reading books
1 Like
It's because almost everyone on here has extremely awful reading comprehension.
What did he mean by this
Reading comprehension is for high school duh
I still say lemayo like it's a real word.
hey just dropping in to say you should all try putting things in your ass
like what are you fucking gay or something? not man enough for a little ass play?
sissies.... smh
real men are comfortable with who they are to do that
this post has been brought to you by drunk on a tuesday night insom
1 Like
If you don’t take massive cocks up your ass your gay
Friends will be disappointed in you
deemed homophobic and virtually unfriendable
Same except for everyone here
Jordan Peterson is the most skillful at the conservative method of mythologizing issues instead of historicizing them. JP does not want you to historicize issues and realize problems now are the result of a series of events; he wants to leave you only thinking about now, with little or nothing else to blame other than the decisions made by individuals. This doesn't sound bad, convincing people to think about their individual decisions and "clean their room" to improve their individual lives. But when this method is used to address issues themselves instead of just as personal advice, you're left with the implication that there must be something essential about these individuals that left them in the circumstances they're in. It isn't a series of historical events that led to the circumstances, there is just something essential about some people that causes them to be in their bad circumstances.
He is so good at this because he never does that essentializing part out loud. He just does the mythologizing and the rest leaving it to be implied. So if you accuse him of doing so, he can easily avoid the accusation rhetorically. But any close look at what he is doing shows this is obviously true.
2 Likes
So is he good or bad