What? Mutual cooperation is the foundation of all anarchism except for egoist bullshit
Deconstructing hierarchies and permanent revolution don't imply war lmao
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Will be following closely for "ignorance is strength" to complete my triplet
its literally the opposite of an orwellian mindset tho
superficial quips like this dont make u look clever
1 Like
No it's not.
yea, permanent revolution and continually overthrowing your own state's structures is completely different from the notion of keeping up permanent war with other states as some kind of unifying stabilizing factor
in some ways opposite
1 Like
oh okay. but some people are better at planning than others. so presumably some guys who are bad at planning will defer decision making to the good planner. and bam u have a representative for a small nation-state. and if that nation-state has more war-power than the family next door...
its just that historically nation states like to war and i dont like war. please describe an endgame without war, where there is permanent revolution but people are not getting shot.
No, because those that are wealthy can accumulate more wealth much more easily and those that aren't can't. Just because they can't pass it on doesn't mean that the poor have an equal shot at getting rich.
Plus, selection pressures are random. It's just like evolution and natural selection: the most fit aren't always the ones that survive because other things can affect what survives. Evolution is a random process that gets down selected, but that doesn't mean the best always win out
I just told you this requires a literal book-length post
The point is about self-deception and cognitive dissonance for a political end
Such as - in order to be Free we must give up many of our freedoms
In order to have Peace we must continually fight violent wars
where did he claim that peace was a goal
youre shoving a square peg into a round hole to look clever
1 Like
No, you're trying to dunk on me to look clever but you're wrong.
no your rong
The point is very simple.
It's about convincing yourself X, which is diametrically opposed to Y, is a necessity to achieve Y
It's about self-deception and extreme logical inconsistency in order to twist reality to suit a political narrative
Once again, form a coherent response to this:
1 Like
what about the anarchist approach is diametrically opposed to its own goals exactly?
You literally replied to me that I can't draw parralels to Orwell because he isn't talking about fighting a war with another nation
Which completely misses the entire concept
So my rebuttal to you calling my post the dumbest post is to tell you to read some of your own.
im not seeing the inherent contradiction you claim exists in that post