They were checking for em at the door :(
I've never been inside a Carl's Jr. before. I don't know what they serve
1 Like
No respect for the hustle
Yes this was my joke
lol
Not anymore. I stole it
■■■■■■
Thanks for admitting you're a complete shithead.
Show me the data that proves me wrong. You can't because there is none.
You've never responded to any of the arguments about why it is necessary and ceding a monopoly on violence to the State fails to create any meaningful progress.
You said to fix it with legislation and the courts. Hint: I made a post sampling a bunch of SCOTUS cases where they have completely undermined any attempts to reform the police or hold them accountable. You never responded.
Already estaBlushed
Yeah, I think if there was any doubt the "sweatshops are good, actually" argument from last night already put that to rest
Last night lol well before that
https://www.amazon.com/LELO-Dynamic-Vibrating-Prostate-Massager/dp/B016WL2QD4
you'll thank me later
1 Like
https://www.amazon.com/Large-Prostate-Massager-Vibrating-Inflatable/dp/B07K8G7CFT
you'll thank me later
that thing cant handle jdance's ass. measley 20 dollar thing psh
Matt's relationship with his dad is so sexual now that I'm thinking about it
Open about dad's prostate massager
Dad giving Matt the 8.5 x 11 print of a steamer for him to "tribute"
Dad bringing home "women" from "Taiwan"
Fucking federal blue xD
If it was the size of a chopstick maybe. Not the size of a fat guys thumb
even if you want to effect social revolution through violent uprising, you have to get through all the other people who are more devoted to order than to justice. which is most people. nobody actually cares about justice, for your definition of justice. in practice, people care more about their own safety and the safety of their families than the welfare of others. so threatening the former for the sake of the latter is not a convincing argument when you don't have enough numbers to win a civil war. violent uprisings happen mostly because the marginal participant judges that the rewards outweigh the risks, for themselves and their families. most of the time it turns out they are actually wrong, but sometimes they are right.
well, actually, maybe you could burn down the house of anyone who doesnt loudly support the revolution, thus making supporting the revolution be profitable for the marginal participant. or socially ostracize them, which apparently you are trying to do.
hm, i feel like i have stumbled upon a new insight. but if this is actually the broad strategy of the revolution, then id prefer you be quashed by the establishment, because my life is good. i dont think most BLM people are on board with this strategy though.
this lends some support to asoul's facist-ish characterization of your activism.
the only way to get normal people who are more devoted to order (personally pertaining to them) than justice with violent revolution is to punish them for not being devoted to justice, that is, otherizing them, socially ostracizing them, making them scared they will be lynched or their house will be burnt down.