Oh, okay.
You can weigh in. What do you think?
I think this is weird. Why is he talking about Jenanda and then lynching epok?
i think that gamut is a newbie player so its not that different from how i'd expect him to act as both town and scum
i do think ur frustration is genuine and ur town
I've been playing Mafia more on than off for fifteen years.
why are u talking to him in third person?
I didn't know if he was still here, like epok I'd assume.
its a bit nitpicky but i think the tone of this post is a bit scummy. i dunno
i want to flip Gamut and shoot Roragok
but i might be wrong i scumread ppl who write like matticus by default (the tone)
alright
Vote Count
| Lynch | Votes | Voters |
|---|---|---|
| magicmagininja | 1 | wolfy |
| gamut | 1 | epok |
| epok | 4 | Roragok, Jenanda_Bollywood, Friend, Gamut |
| wolfy | 2 | bazingaboy, faZ |
Not Voting
KrazyKat, Nyte, yns, Matticus, murs, magicmagininja,
Alive Players - 14
Majority Vote - 8
581d9920-9893-11e9-b70b-459b86ab715c
Because Epok said "I think that the more active players than me are 0 or 1 mafia, and the less active players than me are 2 or 3 mafia", and I think that's total bullshit and I don't agree with that read at all or understand why someone would say something like that. I isoed the more active players and I only see one towny player there.
epok is terrible wagon.
not much improvement from wolfy-faz-jenanda wagons
why dont u guys wanna lynch scum?
who is the towny active player and who are the scummy active players?
I agree that it is nitpicky but there's not much to go on at the moment.
Furthermore when I asked him to clarify his reads he backpedaled and said "oh uhhh those aren't my reads I just think we should lynch an inactive", in spite of the fact that he explicitly said those were his reads earlier.