I just don’t have enough scum man
but great response you’re top town again
Lynch iaafr he’s the only one defending epok and he’s probably wrong
why does it need to be between those three?
+1
flopagis is a snake and we need him out of here
flop is always town
rora is always town
deepthroat is always town
friend is probably town if I’m right on ersu
ersu is always scum (if this is true, nyte is always town)
epok gets lynched regardless of alignment at some point this game unless town wins before he dies so I’m gonna stop talking about reading him
1 Like
Depends how you semantically define moral truth. I mean moral anti-realism and moral realism really both depend on that
Weird l question but ive said why I think its ersu, I think its nyte because of how she treated day 1 and cleared random people and hopped on iaafr, and frand because his reads are ass and im not sure why but I don’t think he actually thinks its me and iaafr
likely town and seemingly spewed town by most of my scum candidates
meaning people who I think are scum treat him like town
I assumed you typoed some of that those are not my top scum so I think it is a valid question.
No I’m mafia
oh. good job so far man you’re owning me.
how’s scumchat?
Shoulda policy lynched him instead of nmagane. At least he tries.
??? how else can you take moral realism than that moral claims have a truth value??? yes independent of psychology. if you’re being honest and you say you are an error theorist then how can you say that you don’t think moral claims have a truth value independent of mind? is this a troll on namafia?
Very quiet but my character read says town, I think if he was scum he woildnt have stated that he changed his opinion of me. I seem like a really easy flip and hed be losing a chance for town to kill town
jdance could legit be mafia and owning me and I have no desire to lynch him today even if this is the case
You realize that philsophers don’t have a consensus for what “moral truth” even means right? You have to define the context otherwise someone can be ultimately skeptical.