not in resemblance, for the record. it just brought it to mind.
well for my part you'd also help me in spelling out more how sophie's survivor claim made you wary
surely not enough to just vote me like that
you and sophie both seem to be taking my votes as more committed than they are. i am entirely tentative right now. i could see myself committing to any of the 3 relevant names later.
well actually i thought there were 3 survivors not 4
that was my thought process
i just didn't say anything when i realized my mistake to see how you guys would act
this seems to be a probabilistic thought process. but really, in my mind, either sophie fake claimed survivor as an evil faction or he didn't. there was no particular reason you thought it was scummy in terms of qualitative intention?
no that was precisely the reason I did
"that" being the probabilistic process? or did you actually find it qualitatively scummy? sorry i'm having trouble parsing this accurately.
anyway the prompt remains that you attempting to develop reads on as many players as possible visibly would help a lot. i'm trying to figure out who the best vote between you, sophie, and vanilla_town is.
based on probability
i'm not smart enough to tell if i'm being fucked with
i am one of the only players in the game, next to matticus, seemingly least fucking with people.
1 Like
this post is phrased in such a non human way lol it's like an AI typed it
it wasn't a read that was meant to be examined or even looked at again, I just threw it out there
sometimes the beauty of asking questions is not needing to know the answer, ya know?
can you just tell me what "qualitatively scummy" as in his post quality? quality in terms of total number of survivors?
surely you'd find it understandable that in struggling to sort reads, i'd be reaching for any sort of lead.
qualitative like the total number of survivors
but isn't thinking about the number of survivors inherently 'probabalistic' ? what's different about it