? what is the issue? he had several cases years ago for this peeing on little girls shit and other things.
How many times should a man be trialed for murder? Once twice? or maybe after he gets convicted and released we should trial him again for the same thing whenever the fuck we want right?
i murder someone
I get tried and go to jail (more accurately, I get out of it but have to pay for lawyers and shit)
i murder someone again
You, an enlightened nadota poster, post: He shouldnt have to keep being tried for the same crimes.
His entire life he has used and abused young women who are drawn to his power
People in positions of power over others and misuse that power should be punished. Often they aren’t and that’s why people are all upset about this guy
yea i think most people are fair to be mad at him if the accusations are true. and yes he is corrupt and did fucked up proven shit in the past.
I think the new resurgence shit is not proven yet, and until the trials and shit we cant be sure, but its easy to believe he’s done it again when you know his past and they levy his past against him in the way they do. right now they have tapes of him having done fucked up new shit. My question lies only on whether these tapes are indeed NEW shit or not. If someone has never seen a tape of it in the past they may feel that something is new when its not just because it just recently appeared to them.
how many people got to watch r kelly abusing a little girl tape? I worry these tapes are not as NEW as they claim to be, and may just be tapes of his past.
One of the things I find the most interesting here that keeps coming up is that the defenders adamantly claim and believe there was no pornography ever found in jackson’s home whereas the attackers claim there was heaps of it, all featuring young boys
Both sides equally certain and claiming there’s tons of evidence