Michael Jackson Was completely INNOCENT.

? what is the issue? he had several cases years ago for this peeing on little girls shit and other things.

How many times should a man be trialed for murder? Once twice? or maybe after he gets convicted and released we should trial him again for the same thing whenever the fuck we want right?

He’s committed more crimes since those cases refspi

it’s not like they’re trying him over and over again for the same cases

Thought experiment:

i murder someone
I get tried and go to jail (more accurately, I get out of it but have to pay for lawyers and shit)
i murder someone again
You, an enlightened nadota poster, post: He shouldnt have to keep being tried for the same crimes.

thats the assumption that he did. we’ll find out when he is convicted or its otherwise proven.

Right now they are using his old cases as Massive leverage over him. Which is unfair.

His entire life he has used and abused young women who are drawn to his power

People in positions of power over others and misuse that power should be punished. Often they aren’t and that’s why people are all upset about this guy

yea i think most people are fair to be mad at him if the accusations are true. and yes he is corrupt and did fucked up proven shit in the past.

I think the new resurgence shit is not proven yet, and until the trials and shit we cant be sure, but its easy to believe he’s done it again when you know his past and they levy his past against him in the way they do. right now they have tapes of him having done fucked up new shit. My question lies only on whether these tapes are indeed NEW shit or not. If someone has never seen a tape of it in the past they may feel that something is new when its not just because it just recently appeared to them.

how many people got to watch r kelly abusing a little girl tape? I worry these tapes are not as NEW as they claim to be, and may just be tapes of his past.

he belongs in jail, why are you hand-wringing about this?

He belongs in jail if

The accusations are true.
The accusations are not things he’s been trialed for and served time/punished for already.

Both of these may already be true, and we just gotta wait. But always remember innocent till proven guilty.

Just dropped today.

MICHAEL WAS INNOCENT 100%

Jesus lmao

Rubba and applehead are great platonic nicknames

Yikes

1 Like

One of the things I find the most interesting here that keeps coming up is that the defenders adamantly claim and believe there was no pornography ever found in jackson’s home whereas the attackers claim there was heaps of it, all featuring young boys

Both sides equally certain and claiming there’s tons of evidence

and yet fbi finds nothing in his house and he gets acquitted for all charges. and now that hes dead they come out the wood works and attack him.

this post was the court document submitting as evidence 3 books involving photos of boys and 2 photos of boys, 1 nude

too lazy to dig up the porn stuff but i think its real?