You could have NK and leave supa in, technically
oh that's true. yeah you were fucked when i figured that out.
So, I no kill, mislynch, win I guess? But I don't think supa budges and I have mega scum fatigue, especially after the way last night went down. I wanted to concede when I saw the thread up after I was done with Friday night magic
If I leave supa in, there was a RB and a kill night 1 with two scum. His no visit result from confirmed dienda tracker night 1 confirms him town
you played super well with your sdadsadsa argument i thought for sure you were town , helps that you were probably right about the thing and him claiming badly
Tracker can claim first, but I think they wait to reveal track targets until bomb and drunk claim so they can catch them lying about their visit if they did track. If they hit a visit, then you can force a thunderdome CC scenario if the track was scum but not janitor, or if it hit drunk visiting a not killed target, it makes that claim more realistic.
And if it was janitor, they have to claim the sus visit on the dead target or they have to lie and get caught. Much higher chance of catching scum out or strengthening a town PR claim
Ninja dying day 1 was very, very bad. LBJ going onto nyte at EoD to not lose the random gives us an extra night to kill bazinga. Of course, he probably gets eliminated d2, but better options for pushing the mislynch.
This is similar to why RB should've gone on dienda last night: sure, we wanted to push dienda or supa more because bazinga was TRing us more, but keeping him open for a mislynch is far, far better and then dienda and bazinga probably vote supa without the scsf track and me claiming a RB on scsf, so supa has to be hooker
It is you vs dein at that point. 4 way. You mislynch him you win.
When you said leave supa in, I thought you meant after killing dienda because I was saying I could've no killed and gone for a mislynch that way
Tracker can claim he is lying a lot more after he sees all claims as town.
No PR is ever clear in this set up. Doesnt matter the order.
But I didn't want to put in the effort of forcing three votes or relying on a roll the last day, especially after today got ended on a roll
it wasnt really a roll i just wanted to be sure i wanted scsf dead over supa
I guess you could have killed dien and left supa in and say you RB dien thinking he is scum and bazinga bussed scsf
That's the point. But hookering him last night leaves bazinga open for a target for him. I have to claim a RB on either supa or scsf, so if he hit that one with the track, it forces it between him, me, or the one he hit. Bazinga is out 100% there.
It's why I wanted day to start at 10am so I could immediately post my claim and have it look more credible compared to posting it after dienda's claim
I think if anyone actually thought about this, it'd make zero sense. If tracker is dead, then hooker just hooks me and they get a kill through no matter what: the only hooker target with two scum and drunk, bomb, and hooker claims is tracker. So if I'm town, I never block the tracker claim in case it's real and always try to block hooker that's outside PRs in case the tracker is real and bazinga is fake
Well I just wanna day that I had a lot of fun for my first game. My ignorance was not faked at any point. Worked out though.
my team sucked (mostly lbj) (but also ewiz claiming drunk when i wanted to since i was hooker). came down to basically a coinflip with bazinga's vote
Dienda getting hooked and sdad dying means my claim to block scsf confirms either:
- Supa hooker with scsf partner
- Supa hooker with bazinga partner
- dienda fake claim with scsf partner
- dienda fake claim with supa partner
- bazinga hooker with scsf partner
- Me+scsf, because supa confirmed town night 1
That's far more possible mislynch candidates for day 3
it really did feel fake at a lot of points i was super paranoid all game about every PR