I don't know if I agree; there's a viewpoint of politics where the basic result is that a political group would embark and complete projects that adhered to their ideology, their constituents views, whatever, and this is fine and all.
But there's something that is more apparent in reality where libtards just spew "Medicare for All" when asked about political projects when they can never actually happen; i.e. what is sensible is slowly doling out tiny bits of socialism to the largest swathe of people you can reasonably appeal to like they're a prisoner. So it's difficult for me to say that the libtards should have legislated Roe into federal law when they had power.
I have serious doubts that appealing to the 80 IQ black woman r*tard in the Walmart parking lot confers you more power than appealing to the wealthy, the elite, the "intellectual" (priest) class.
I'm reasoning from the perspective that the Democratic party wants to enact progressive policy (to respond to insom) and then establishing that they completely failed to do so, even when they had ample opportunities - suggesting they don't actually have the will to do so. We're saying the same thing
The fact of the matter is the Democratic Party's main policy goal (since Obama and with the exception of Bernie) has been to get elected and stay elected. There is no vision or driving goal for the country. This is why Trump connects with people better - he can articulate a simple vision for the country, speaks to its real issues, and gets something done - even if "get something done" is build a ridiculous wall on the southern border of the country.
What have the Dems gotten done in 4 years of Biden? There's simply a lack of will to do anything. They neutered the party by kicking Bernie out and replacing him with corporate campaigners and now that they're in power they don't know what to do but collect money and continue the slow roll toward collapse of the disgusting corporeal corporate state.
I believe you brainlet2 emoted me a week ago when I said the point of the government was to take from white people and give to black people, but frankly that's the only domestic policy BIden has.
I don't really think money transfer to black people is the privately held policy of the Biden family
We are talking specifically about the candidates here
I think the privately held policy of the candidates is money transfer to themselves. Via election to the highest office in the land
This is well-established for Biden in his 8 years as VP and in his first term as president. Massive money transfer to Biden family through Hunter's engagement in Ukraine, China, followed by massive money transfer from the American taxpayer to corrupt bureaucrats in Ukraine in recent years
Which brings me to my second perceived private policy position of the Biden family and their likely reason for resisting stepping down: Avoidance of prosecution for corruption and investigation of these money transfers
I think the transfer of money to black people is incidental for these candidates (cost of doing business/same to them as "trickling to prisoners" with medicare reform or whatever). However there may be people within the Biden Administration for whom this is an actual privately held policy position
totally forgot his progressive policy of letting any rapist and murder cross the border because you hope they'll illegally vote in the next election and/or suppress wages to tamper inflation.
Again. A case of the publicly visible policy being "just get elected at any cost" and private policy being somewhat nebulous. What I said in my first post about this
As an aside it's very funny to bring working class Hispanic men into the country and think they are going to be the new bastion of liberal voters
I give it like 5 years these guys will be the new religious far-right. It's already happened in Florida - living in Miami feels like living in Playa Del Carmen except they charge US tourist prices instead of Mexico tourist prices
This is like when people try to say LKY of Singapore is a conservative dictator
Foreign domestic politics work on different axes than US politics. Maybe even US politics work on different axes than the stated ones. Is Trump actually a "conservative" or does he just need to play to the Republican party to get elected? Does he actually care about preventing abortion or pandering to the religious right?
In a lot of ways Trump is the "progressive" in that he wants to enact liberal social change and DNC are the "conservatives" in that they prefer to maintain the status quo and use taxpayer money to shore up corporate and military deep state support