it will take a bit for me to distance you from bigass’s actions with the poll and that attempt to ‘sus out scum’. there are vague town telly hints in some of his posts, but nothing i’m confident on, especially not paired with your posts or reactions.
Sophie town will go on the offensive and then self-implode is necessary to get the point across
you normally question me right away with the pressure. you didn’t question anything. i question what i’m pressuring you about. it looks ‘fake’ that you didn’t make any comments on it.
I was starting to understand Nyte's line and then she drops this
It just seems like such nonsense that it's hard to see it as real
he doesn’t go on the offensive, he goes on the defensive. the offensive is him offing himself.
I thought the same thing. It almost seems like a slip, where she’s justifying a story instead of developing it.
Sorry to talk about you like you’re not here Nyte. It seems like you just scumslipped.
We just don’t agree about vetoing, and I’m fine with that. I wasn’t thinking about “strong” players because the pattern right now is that if you random roll any two scum (except BA/lucky) and let us go at it we’ll end up attacking the vocal towns and losing.
1 Like
Yeah I got the same thing where she says I’m blanket townreading her but I don’t see any evidence of that. She was saying the same thing last game so maybe trying to force that into this game?
I have two thoughts for this game
-
You lynch the people not even putting the effort to look like town before the people at least making an effort (LBJ before Nyte)
-
When someone has very different thinking than everybody else in the game it's because they're living in a different reality (scum chat - Nyte)
That’s the vibe I was getting at earlier today when I said she was impersonating herself.
Trying to avoid this basically
Like do I think Nyte is loony enough to have a completely different view of the game and reality than everyone else without being in a scum chat?
Yes probably
Is it a scum slip? Maybe
But I want to avoid lynching the active participants in the thread (as matty describes - attacking vocal players and losing)
Let's get the low effort sneaky scums out first
Actually as 0% player if the two of you are saying Nyte before LBJ I will sit my 0% ass down and listen
But I do think letting this guy slip by and focusing on the active players is bad for the game and bad for the culture here
It's also interesting that Nyte just disappeared as soon as you came in and said she scum slipped
i’m just scumreading you for this attitude. even if you’re not technically wrong about “vocal” towns. maybe you just have mafia fatigue……
i genuinely think everyone must, if they’re thinking ian is the right vote on that poll. unfortunately for bigass, it has little to do with who the absolute best player is, and more to do with ian being historically pretty bad at town voting, and pretty good at scum playing. so, understanding what people are voting for, i find kind of important. 5 people, across a range of people, chose ian. i literally want to understand this. (but it just looks kinda faked)
Okay fine. I made a group chat with everyone in the game and told them to vote me and not you so that you would think they saw me as a better mafia player.
i knew it.
I would have gotten away with it, if it weren’t for you meddling kids.
No it was genuinely because he's been playing really well and has come out as a top town player recently. It's pretty much the opposite of what you said - the poll is an exact ranking of how towns view the person's town play ability.
This seems like an impossible thing to believe/say at this point
What exactly is faked? Like we are all scum and faking that we think Ian's a good town player and you are not?