hard to agree with that when I think the only ban I agreed with was goy but w/e
1 Like
Listen here bucko I change the ban rules every day
Ban rules: changed
Semen: extracted
Living the life of the ideal man here ama
1 Like
when there's no mafia to hunt we turn on each other
2 Likes
I agree that her brandishing her mod gun here is maybe overstepping. We could probably try seeing if we can define some obscenity wrt women rule if that's where we're going here. I just think it's important that her sex is fairly represented even if females makes up a small percentage of overall users tbh
We must ensure all cultures, races, and genders are properly represented on this site of 15 users
3 Likes
observation bias, this site has a surprising number of regular users (although it is clearly much less than like 10 months ago). how often do you think you guys open up pages on a daily basis
this also explains why LBJ and osiris are mods
2 Likes
I’m the perfect mod
Severe lack of retained semen
Low ability to care
High ability to ignore whiners
1 Like
And again you might type all this out, but the truth is that the reason you sit where you sit is because you don’t understand or at least perceive the content as questionable (aka you don’t see the oppressive language)
That’s all fine. The reality is I never said it was bannable. The irony being that I was commenting on the opposite. That he “knew” what he was doing would cause upset.
If this were all what I viewed as bannable why would he not be banned? (Since we’re addressing nytes power mad habits)
the quotation marks here change how i interpret your statement by a lot
so apparently i misread what you meant
ok
Of course you did and that’s my point. You perceive me a certain way like all the time. It’s cool.
and like
he didnt even express knowing its bannable
he expressed paranoia of being banned over it
Why is that? And what’s the difference (for conversation/clarity)
there's a lot less room for misinterpretation and inference if you make your statements more clear and explicit
Is that true or is engaging in good faith more important? I’m not sure where I sit between those.
the reason i asked my first question is because i thought the post that bothered me was you acting in the capacity of a moderator and stating that there was in fact something bannable about that post and its interesting that refpsi knew so
in that context, i asked what the rule was and how we were supposed to know (pretty reasonable questions to ask a mod acting as a mod)
are you implying that i wasnt engaging in good faith? you infer way too much about my intentions all the time
you thinking you know what bothers me doesnt invalidate all the other things that bother me that you havent thought about
so just answer the questions directly, or explain how you think ive misinterpreted the post that prompted the question
liberalism has made women think their opinion is something valid
fwiw if we're going to throw around bans im still more open to banning plasma than refpsi because plasmas posts are just a lot less amusing
he can be the sacrifice