Here's that in-group preference showing itself again and it's producing one of the dumbest posts in the thread.
@insom
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
DIVERSITY IS A STRENGTH
1 Like
The Kamala trick is working. Giving DNC some distance from their awful policies of the last 4 years - frustration over inflation and Israel in the rear mirror, they can say again "Anybody but Trump!" and it seems to be getting through to people
If they can just avoid getting Kamala up on a debate stage or having her make any speeches this might work!
you are inexcusably ignorant
consciously incompetent
Explain your legislation â â â â â â â Propose something.
President Kamala Harrisâs elevation to the Democratic Partyâs standard-bearer now puts her in a stronger position to advocate for a shift in U.S. policy toward Israel and to carry out those changes should she win in November.
The plan is for Harris to have her own separate meeting with the Israeli leader, according to an aide to Harris. She wonât be in Washington for his high-stakes speech to Congress because she will be traveling to Indianapolis for a previously scheduled event.
During the meeting, Harris is expected to tell Netanyahu that âit is time for the war to end in a way where Israel is secure, all hostages are released, the suffering of Palestinian civilians in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can enjoy their right to dignity, freedom, and self-determination,â the aide said.
The Israeli lobby is going to steamroll this woman. At this point I think it's to save down-ballot House/Senate because it makes zero sense from a larger foreign policy perspective to come out against Israel.
Key Biden appointees, including national security adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin wouldnât likely be extended in their current roles, current and former officials say.
All these guys have sucked but the people who were going to replace them will suck even harder lmao.
The Clinton administration dubbed the U.S. an âindispensable nationâ and undertook selective military interventions to quell ethnic strife in the Balkans, while the Obama administration was more cautious about the use of force and balked at providing lethal military assistance to Ukraine.
Clinton's immediately endorsed Kamala and Obama hasn't.
As vice president, Harris hasnât had an opportunity to define her own brand of foreign policy, though some observers say she might ultimately align herself more closely with the progressive elements of the Democratic Party and might be more inclined to make U.S. support for Israel more conditional on its conduct in Gaza and the West Bank.
Given that Iran will have a nuclear weapon in weeks I believe, it makes zero sense for the Israelis to not completely obliterate whoever comes out against them.
1 Like
The purpose is to pay lip service to "restraining Israel" while continuing to do nothing, which has been the Dem MO for decades.
They realized Biden was losing a major voting block due to his lack of ability or will to do anything about the genocide. Something like 100k arabs in Michigan
Kamala can distance herself from that in name (through a handful of "she just might!" articles like this one) or even get some seeming concession out of Netanyahu ahead of the election. This voting block is highly susceptible to this sort of manipulation despite 4 years of being absolutely fucked in the ass by Biden
After the election things will return to business as usual (in a hypothetical Kamala admin) - fact of the matter is the dem-corporate industrial state has no ability or will to check Israel.
As I said before: The only policy position is to get elected. All of this is just to get elected, it has no bearing on the actual policy of a potential Kamala admin.
the legislation is shut the fuck up with your idea that you should govern womens bodies and or stop acting like the way abortions were "legal" up until the recent over-turning was actually detrimental to you or a healthy society. figure out a different way to build a workforce in future society - "pro life" is such a joke argument.
men can write legislation about how they willingly submit themselves to birth control practices in order to protect the lives of potential unborn children from being conceived and aborted.
(you can't, you won't, stay out of the legality of abortion as a result. keep it a safer option, and literally know that most of the time it's been done because of the men involved. i don't know how to tell you this, but we don't have thousands of virgin mary situations. men were involved. uninvolve yourselves if it's such a hot issue about the sanctity of life [yes, you're a piece of shit assoul])
1 Like
The female @insom.
As I've said before, there are numerous occasions where the state feels the need to step in regards to medical procedures: vaccinations, allocations of transplants, mental illness, triaging, etc.
My investment in this area is moreso along the lines of philosophizing or writing a college paper while your investment in it is making sure your continuous barcrawling isn't interrupted.
????
You've presented zero argument.
If you can't govern women's bodies why should men's bodies be governed? You're also running into a problem with reality: why does no one ask "who's the mother?" in regards to a pregnancy -- it's just fundamentally unworkable.
This is just nonsense -- you're just emphasizing that "men are involved" but the argument is "men can't be involved and have no say in the matter".
1 Like
I think the difference here is that I've read both the pro-abortion and pro-life literature while you watch CNN.
1 Like
This is wrong in regards to foreign policy positions. You can't repeatedly tell Netanyahu in public that he's enabling a genocide and then expect him to side with you later in LYLO.
1 Like
On a Dark Desert Highway...
Cool wind in my hair...
It's a completely legitimate position to delegate your abortion viewpoint on the basis of "I'm a libtard", "I watch CNN", "I'm a registered democrat", but it's uncharitable and intellectually bankrupt of you to be calling other people stupid, uniformed, or even projecting beliefs and thoughts onto them when you yourself have outsourced your agency to globohomo.
1 Like
plenty of men are whores (myself included). We just readily apply the label to women. what do you call a guy who fucks 100 women. a stud?
You're not the one impacted by that legislation, so why do you think your (feeling-based) argument matters -- especially moreso than a woman? you might as well be labeling yourself Chud Deluxe
I am painfully aware of the promiscuity of gay men.
1 Like