Checkmate libtards.
These guys think "generational wealth" can exist for 200 years post civil war but at the same time think that the boomer who hires his son to run his car dealership is going to run the business into the ground.
Shocking Behavior: Random Wealth in Antebellum Georgia and Human Capital Across Generations - PMC.
Does the lack of wealth constrain parents’ investments in the human capital of their descendants? We conduct a nearly fifty-year followup of an episode in which such constraints would have been plausibly relaxed by a random allocation of substantial wealth to families
Although winners had slightly more children than non-winners, they did not send them to school more. Sons of winners have no better adult outcomes (wealth, income, literacy) than the sons of non-winners, and winners’ grandchildren do not have higher literacy or school attendance than non-winners’ grandchildren. This suggests only a limited role for family financial resources in the formation of human capital in the next generations in this environment and a potentially more important role for other factors that persist through family lines.
There's a nordic study about Lottery winners I'm going to need to find.
This is a fucking hot take
There night be some people who fit your profile but you can't generalize most left people hate their dads and right hate their moms. Lol
1 Like
For anyone that isn't interested in resurrecting the "cause":
I tried for like 10 minutes to make that link properly and I still can't figure it out. I'm so old.
brother you think anyone smugly posting incorrect information or doing weird red herring gaslighting, is going to buy and or read a book? has a library card?
That's why I said for anyone not interested in resurrecting the "cause"
That said looks like an interesting read.
Incorrect information? I'm just posting the wikipedia article.
what are those?
ty
If you buy something from an academic press they'll send you quarterly pamphlets of the stuff that's being published.
ok i do that too
How about this. When parts of the Civil Rights Act of 1875 were struck down by the Supreme Court, were they influenced and lobbied by former slave owners, and did they have that influence because of the wealth they built pre reconstruction?
specifically what are they?