Yep.
They need to get off the internet and touch grass.
But for when you don't want to hit their stupid share link just nuke the "?" and everything after
https://www.amazon.com/Slavery-Another-Name-Re-Enslavement-Americans/dp/0385722702
Its an important community service to keep him occupied and contained here.
The idea that "wealth" can survive a complete total war, the emancipation of significant assets, and then federal occupation for 20 years is the absolutely stupid.
Good point.
I can scroll past this drivel and read the rest.
Have a wonderful rest of your evening o7
Douglas A Blackman?
READING FROM CHICAGO FROM 2024
From the World History Section
"THE RULING FAMILY OF RUS"
"CHEQUERED PAST, UNCERTAIN FUTURE
"A SHORT HISTORY OF FINLAND"
From Science
"OTHERWORDLY ANTARCTICA"
"MOUNTAINS OF FIRE"
"DAWN AT MINERAL KING VALLEY"
Watching Jaws right now and loving it
Would they have had that influence without owning slaves? I don't care if you think it's a stupid idea.
"We're gonna need a bigger boat."
You literally just believe in some insane blood libel -- anything that had a single touch of slavery poisons the whole and can only be seen as the cause. It's absolutely stupid.
Yes or no?
What -- you want me to entertain a counterfactual where they don't have slaves LMAO?
Jones.
You are posting into the void.
This is what I meant when I said you barge in saying some irrelevant shit. When directly asked about a precise example of the main point I'm making, you can't even manage "no"
It's a stupid question. You're putting forth a counterfactual of "well what if X didn't happen, what if they didn't have slaves" in a question about history LMAO