i do this too, i think it might be universal across all personality types tbh.
Iâm not far off the mark youâre wrong. What appears to be happening now is a classic and documented archetype of sorts of the romanticist versus the technologist. Youâre too constrained to your existing beliefs in mathematics and âpersonal growthâ; ironically these prevent individuality more so than what you claim archetypes do.
Are you trying to gaslight me again? I said that mental illnesses come with personality traits - in fact you could say that mental illnesses as a whole are just aliases for a group of traits bundled together.
You have the narcissism trait - you donât have to âgive yourselfâ anything for that to be true.
Romantics believed in the natural goodness of
humans which is hindered by the urban life of
civilization. They believed that the savage is noble,
childhood is good and the emotions inspired by
both beliefs causes the heart to soar.
I do not have the narcissism trait. I am not self-obsessed.
You have a very childish idea of what narcissism is if you truly think youâre not narcissistic.
And itâs getting really old, whatever label youâre trying to drive home on me.
Whilst I give no credence to modern day psychology terms; you do bear some traits of what would be defined a narcissist although I think that termâs negativity is overinflated - I think narcissism is healthy to a degree.
I really donât care anymore, then. I donât trust your judgement.
Itâs getting really old how you continually try to spark up debates for attention and act angry youâre being called out on it.
I didnât try to spark a debate when I said typology is unfair to the individual, especially on an internet forum where people are trying to be individuals.
Itâs not unfair it promotes individual growth and understanding.
Again using the âinternet forumâ phrase to separate yourself from your obvious flaws.
Have you ever played mafia @a2pas? How can you speak about typology when you havenât experienced any psychological games?
That is scientifically debatable, and thereâs yet to be any empirical evidence that these typologies are correct. Itâs all psychoanalytical bullshit that makes people feel smart to study them, as I had, but most of that changed when I took courses that refuted this era in psychology.
Iâve played it face to face, yes.
I have flaws, we all do. Please tell me what obvious flaws you see.
That is not how it is meant to be experienced, so Iâll take that as a no.
Narcissism
There are courses that refute that refutal. Opinions in science are often based on personality and whatâs cool - archetypes and Jung are the godfathers and the perfect descriptors of humanity so - like how people like to hate on popular music acts and films to be cool - a counter culture movement grew with well articulated but meaningless garbage leading to our modern day joke of psychology. Just because your courses told you to refute doesnât mean they didnât have MotivesâŚ