iaafr + epok makes sense actually
I may have missed this: I haven't slept in a couple days, but hbotz thoughts?
Still leaning town on him. His worldview is easy to understand and I liked his response to the TMI allegations.
Was that today? What was it? Because his posts today are like nonsensical when I read them
Mostly his day 1. I also get the feeling he's actually interested in getting information from people (by how he phrases his questions) as opposed to iaafr who just throws emotionless prods left and right
Can you quote his defense on TMI that looked good to you d1? Because all I saw was shit on TMI. That's why I moved to him
ah yes speaking of which
"hello if mafia nominate afk i hereby clear myself because i wouldn't do that as it is suboptimal"
well, scsf is an afk and osiris doesnt have much content. i kind of assumed they would nominate 3 active players (in the wolfy/ian hullabaloo) or 3 afk players; this is just weird.
i would have done the former doe.
v
Re-reading a bit I think I'm actually starting to lean more towards magic over osiris. He came in early day 2, posted shit that aligned with a fully formed theory/rebuttal of the possibilities of what will happen today:
Which reads a lot like what scum would likely do in this situation, don't think town magic would type this.
And osiris's posts today have been fairly neutral in my view, hard to get a read from them without resorting to a ton of WIFOM logic.
r e t a rd ed post, please kys
Yes you can. Start a reply here, highlight, then hit quote.
cant get over how bad this post is. you're actually incredibly scum lmao
if i die please kill hubotz
Maybe I'm just dumb and he's scum
i precommitted to making that post on the first day. wont back down now
i cannot be mafia cuz i would have done something different as mafia. EZPZ
Like I townread this shit as well. Coming up with weird shit like this is towny in my eyes
LMAO 
1 Like
hubotz leans over his keyboard, cackling menacingly
"ah yes, hehehe, time to put my ebic plan into action in ythes mafio game Xd"
"I will simple post a string of letters saying i wouldnt nominate an afk player.... eheheheheh"
he cackles again, and it turns to a mighty covid cough
"and then, the next day, after nominating an 'afk' player (not afk btw), i will claim they are afk and i am right.... XDD"
he takes a sip of his cum chalice
"and then.... i will be town cleared ..... PERMANENTLY!!! XDDDD"
1 Like
very ebic plan hubotz please coach me mafia 7k mmr tY
How was it a good defense? The first paragraph was misunderstanding the argument. The second paragraph was blatantly false: I went off on every reasoning he had being contrived and didn't make sense. The third paragraph seems like poor reasoning again. Just an assertion that "scum would afk rather than argue," which is the exact opposite of what he had said about it yesterday (which was one of the poorly faked "reasonings" I called out yesterday). He literally said that if Ian was scum, Ian would've kept hounding me instead of giving up. Now he's saying scum would just start shit and coast?