yeah so it isnt really a lead
He’s not on steam
My cTz a full time job lol. Ima see if Matty can sub for me
This is bullshit. Friend is definitely the lynch
What makes you any different from friend and nma? All of you claimed SK.
It was the manner in which the claims happened. Read friend claiming and what led up to it. It wasn't a fake claim
yeah i agree. friend looked like he was rage-quitting. if he was, then i agree with everyone who said eliminating the SK first is our best bet because it means one less night kill.
Lynch Friend
The return after the rage quit post to still defend himself has me much more certain he is scum
Either way we get a scum or a SK. It is our best bet for now.
The other question is who our vigilante targets. Or decides to not kill.
My vote is that vig does not kill tonight. Too high of a chance to kill a town.
What’s up with the new kkat? Why’s he so aggressive.
I’m not a fan of kkat’s posting at all
donner party means 3 kills each night. we have to lynch a scum or the sk to have a chance to win.
Going to sleep, but please think about what i said.
Our chance of winning goes way down if we don’t lynch scum or SK today.
Our vigilante shouldn’t kill tonight unless he is really sure.
I am VT and I played several donner party games before.
If we get behind, we are done. Scum or SK win.
Friend seems super sketchy. His reaction seems way over the top and seems like a scum trying to gain town cred by feigning nonchalance. Krazy Kat (if it’s him) seems really weird as well, I’ve played like 20 games with the guy and this is the polar opposite of how he usually plays. Then again he’s played like that as scum too so I’m not sure what this means.
No - my intent was not to “prompt the real sk into claiming”. It was to see who was willing to argue with me and who was willing to accept it, and how easily.
It was - simply put - a way to analyze every player at once from their reactions to the claim.
You simply fell for it - and I kept pushing (by “arguing” that I was “right”) because I immediately knew you weren’t town.
Vigilante targets you or kieran
What do you mean? The "le substance" is coming from who I'm suspecting not from me. I'm not going to repeat what already happened and list it to them, but instead I will only try to make them dig deeper by pushing more arguments and more discussion.
I don't "play scummy as town" - It's very obvious when I'm town that I am. If you can't properly read my intents then it's your fault.
Here’s how it goes: I make an obscenely fake claim (Ewiz claims SK -> I make a silly “Are you sure?” post then impatiently claim SK back as the thread wasn’t active at the time and I had to go to work), start arguing with the first person who says I should be lynched (notice that many people read it and did not think that I should be lynched right away - did Friend think that he was having an Epiphany of though when he called to lynch SK? No - his through process was clouded by his confusion and guilt from being SK himself (and also a hint of childish opportunism as he thought he caught mafia)), then after he gives up (It was irrelevant whether he claimed his role as SK or not, he was going to get lynched 100% anyway) - I analyze the posts from OTHER players who posted during my argument with him and before his concession claim and make judgments on their roles based on that. I don’t do things just so “no one suspects me when I roll scum”, your shallow thinking might be your demise in a game so heavily focused on psychology and analysis (especially with a player-base so clearly versed on those subjects from the looks of it). I am playing as optimally as I can at the moment and will not let go of my advantage to let you “town read me” when I don’t need you to. I would like to point out - for the record - that your slandering of me could be with the intent of reducing people’s trust in me as I called you out as being mafia before I even got in the “argument” (It was all fake - clearly) with friend and this is your attempt of protecting yourself. Which might explain why you haven’t placed your vote on friend yet, hm?. You wanted to get as much slander out as you could on your accusers before the day ends so you could get an easy fake lynch for day 2 - after you were handed the day 1 lynch on a silver platter by none other than your accuser himself. I wouldn’t put that past consideration. Your arguments are weak and your attempts at shaking me cannot ever work - sorry about that. I am looking forward for your response.