your main read (never not scum here - iaafr) was wrong though
bruh idk how you imagine im supposed to handle your naked reads with no reasons beyond looking at them and thinking about the players on the list more
which i pretty much did
im not gonna strongarm the whole town into saying "sheep nytes reads"
in a scenario where we sheeped your reads, we'd have to start with your flagship read and you'd lose all credibility from there
this isn't a good job nyte argument
this is a 'people continually say nyte has good reads then don't actually use the info but instead blame her for bad town play' argument.
thats honestly a faz problem because i never blamed you myself
dont take a faz problem out on me
only faz said that
no, my flagship read was an sk, you could absolutely start by following an sk. he's going to do scumhunting
faz and epok correctly towncleared me on my play
we won the game
youre talking as if we lost or some shit
and i didnt even not look at your reads
faz is not the only one who's said i don't play with town well, i could probably dig up sdad, kyle, and others who've said as much. i want to say i recall you inputing on it as well, but i will only say it's a feeling since you are expressing something differently at this moment.
maybe at day but he's going to PRhunt at night though so you'd need to lynch him either way
unless he's 100% outed and is being kept in chains or something
also siding with the SK is not something you "absolutely start" with, it's something you do as a last resort when you've lynched 3 towns in a row and you need the killpower
it doesn't really matter, i was wrong anyway
i'm just trying to generate discussion that literally not mentioned a d1 lynched towns reads for the rest of the game (iaafr did? but everyone else) is not a good way to solve a game. *particularly if it's considered a good reads player.
like honestly, i'm surprised kkat never pointed out anything, he's usually pretty ontop of town lynches and cross examining reads and votes.
(it's why i would never call him a "useless" player as others might :P)
i don't mind how you play but i'm not going to take up the mantle of convincing everybody else to respect it
a playstyle of just dropping 2-4 posts of reads that are accurate when youre town isn't very interactive or engaging
i prefer the engaged/active way me/faz/sdad/alightsoul(vt/mafia) play but i don't complain about the way you/bazinga play because i honestly don't mind, and i just want to get my own reads on both of you right (which i kinda did this game but flipflopped and sacrificed you as a vtorscum read at eod1) and possibly use your reads correctly, but at the same time, again, im not up to arguing with faz about respecting/townreading you two when i don't really have the lockest of townreads and i probably can't get him to respect your playstyle
like idk i dont really have a horse in this race im just here to clear my name if you're coming at me with faz issues
if i win that means my playstyle was correct
i mean you realize that your lackadaisical attitude towards me and being so willing to vote me d1 is largely the reason i was convinced you weren't town. i was suspicious but that seemed to be a red flag
i could point out a bunch of posts that were un-meta of you
but it's not really an argument against your play - it's meta, theres no "wrong" way for you to play your meta. there were just some worldviews in your posts that i found pretty alarming and inauthentic iaafr gamesolve mentality.
a town of five fazs and five bazingaboys probably loses but a town of five iaafrs and five bazingaboys probably wins
did you read my posts explaining why i prioritized voting a vt read when i had no super confident scumreads at eod
it was nothing personal
i just didnt know if kkat/insom were prs or not but i had a vt read on you