fuck the police general

What texts did you read?

I hate concept posting

U realize hbotz normal demo is braindeads

normal demo?

let the set S be a set of strategies

a normal form game on n players is a function

f(X): S^n -> R^n

mapping each strategy for each player to a utility for each player.

a strategy profile X is in nash equilibrium if for each player i

f(s_1 .. s_i .. s_n)_i >= f(s_1 .. s .. s_n)_i

for each s in S

1 Like

Demographic
His normal circle he has these convos with

ya i mean theres gotta be some collection of pseuds or headnodders reinforcing this shit

its strange that youre joining to criticize my takes on the thing i have the most expertise in.

i think you should study game theory before criticizing my game theory, unironically. youre just headnodding ewiz.

2 Likes

if
f(s_1 .. s_i .. s_n)_i < f(s_1 .. s .. s_n)_i

we call this an "incentive to deviate [from the nash equilibrium]" because the player i would rather play s than s_i since it would net them a higher utility.

when f(s_1 .. s_i .. s_n)_i >= f(s_1 .. s .. s_n)_i

for all s in S then there is "no incentive to deviate".

poor iaafr and luckyartist sticking their heads in at the wrong time :pensive:

u should attack the actual pseudointellectual stuff like whether the average german during nazi germany was a horrible person or not

1 Like

it's pretty dumb when iaafr/nyte/LBJ's only contributions in the thread is spouting the same line about how hbotz only has surface level takes on the topics he discuss without explaining why or adding anything meaningful to the debate, just serves to create a mob mentality vs hbotz where all his opinions are marginalized

2 Likes

Who cares if itā€™s dumb it isnā€™t as dumb as hbotz :trumpidk:

Also mob mentality lmao tell me when hbotz actually reads something of substance

i mean look hbotz argument is like

on the tier of this

http://rebirthofreason.com/Articles/Gores/Game_Theory_of_Communism_and_Capitalism.shtml

page by some random objectivist from santa clara

and theres so many assumptions in it and why would i care enough to start getting into it

nobody here cares

im here to repeat nobody here cares and i just see hbotz as dumb

he can keep thinking of me as a dumb parrot because i dont care enough what he thinks to disprove it

"all his opinions are marginalized" as if theres any better outcome or it matters what any of us think on any of this

on another note, hbotz's armor of tranquility seems to be cracking

Lol I took graduate courses in it, dumbfuck. Alright, so, that function, are there restrictions on it? If so, what?

Please relabel your indices so this isn't vacuously false

They tried to engage him before and explain shit to him. He refused to read and engage in good faith. I only do it still because I find arguing with morons entertaining

Damn I was gonna flame ewiz for bad formattting but he fixed it

Ya know to be fair to both sides

Xdxdxd

For those who care about the long term, and wish to maximize their rewards, Capitalism is the choice. The only thing that prevents a society from becoming more Communist is that the producers disallow the wealth redistributors from taking their wealth. Remove their reward, remove their motivation to perform such an action. To maximize the rewards of your work over the long term, you must disallow others from gaining from attempting to take your wealth. Examples: The USA Founding Fathers, John Galt, Francisco d'Anconia, Ragnar Danneskjƶld.

John Galt

1 Like