There are distinctions and equivocating looting a business with burning down a house with raping someone is fucking horseshit and you know it, you worthless sack of shit.
The first sentence literally contradicts the second. The devastation of a rich person losing their house which is insured is not the fucking same as someone being raped. You are absolute scum and deserve to be called as such and excluded from any society that has any semblance of justice.
i think he has a naive idea that capitalism causes all the evils and when the institutions are burnt down everyone in the world will be happy and have enough to eat
hes just really weird im thinking
I'll admit "You admitted earlier you'd have been a nazi out of convenience" is one of the unintentionally funniest things in this thread
You have no idea
i think this should be a standard metric for moral humility or something. if you were born into nazi germany, would you be a nazi out of convenience? by statistics, the answer should be yes for most people. so if you answer no i guess ur some kind of saint?
You are meeting post-introduction-to-normal-society ewiz
Some of us knew the pre- version and are still dealing with the personal trauma
Post-left anarchism.
Critique of capital to build a critical mass, like it did in the early 20th century with miners and was only put down through the State sending the national guard out to slaughter them and the corporations sending out Pinkertons to murder them.
Private property is any privately owned mechanism for the creation of wealth. Personal property is an individual's property that is not used for accruing wealth.
Which ones are unclear?
The rich and those that serve the State in their mechanisms of oppression.
The destruction of their private property to destroy their foundation of power, i.e. their mechanisms for accruing wealth off of the backs of the poor.
actually the "just replace every word by jew" meme might be frighteningly accurate here.
ewiz currently believes all the ills of the world are caused by capitalist institutions, with a lot of literature to back it up. but if he was a german in nazi germany isnt it frighteningly possible he might believe the ills of the world are caused by jewish institutions with a lot of literature to back it up?
please note that i think both of those things are false.
trump voters are ewiz's favored revolutionary people tho. ppl with little to lose who want to burn down the establishment.
It's exactly the system of thought which results in genocide and that was my original point in replacing his "JBP is a reactionary!!" stuff with the word Jew
if you actually punched those people ud have ggd ur own movement
I never fucking said any of this you goddamn moron. Capitalism is a mechanism through which economic inequality is perpetuated. There are other mechanisms to do so: Stalin and Mao proved that. And I never fucking argued that economic inequality is the root of all inequality: those excerpts from Wilderson show that racial inequality is not predicated on economic inequality, as does the argument about mass incarceration rates of poor black people vs poor white people.
oh, okay. then you werent exactly making a defense for caring mostly about the evils you can see. i just think its inappropriate to call someone 'the worst kind of person' in the general case. because morality is weak and highly amenable to circumstance.
No, refusing to support the nazis just means that you're a person with a modicum of compassion and empathy.
You, on the other hand, are a selfish, worthless piece of shit.
okay, so do you think most germans born into nazi germany are that?
i think i am relatively neurotypical with an average amount of empathy for others. from the numbers i can see this corresponds to nazi, in nazi germany.
I never made this claim. In fact, I state the opposite multiple times. You just have the reading comprehension of a third grader.
Not at fucking all. Your explanation of why it does makes no fucking sense: targeting a group in whose membership is voluntary is not the same as targeting a group that cannot change their membership in that group. Hint: it didn't matter if your religion was Judaism, just that you were ethnically Jewish.
So who qualifies for question 1 and how exactly should their private property be destroyed
eg. people above a certain threshold of wealth should be burned and looted?
What about people who don't meet those qualifications but don't agree with you & your tactics? What fate should befall them? We are talking about normal everyday people who speak out in support of the oppressive systems you are trying to dismantle
That's not a fucking moral statement, it's an ethical one. Did you learn nothing from the discussion on morality? Of course you didn't, because you'd read one paragraph of a five paragraph wiki article someone linked and be content that you learned enough. You are the worst kind of person when you support the exploitation of sweatshops and being a nazi because you care more about yourself than literal genocide.