No. Winning depends on who can play like the computer more.
Dota is Cookie clicker and that’s a fact
there is not an objectively correct solution you know nothing about chess or how chess computers work, please stop this conversation as the more you type the more ignorant you sound
No, I am not ignorant and you are wrong. I say objectively in human terms (already made this clear) as if you just ask the computer what move to make you will win against a human opponent.
It’s like you’re saying that tic tac toe is a game because if someone plays wrong you can win - when in reality there IS an objectively correct move.
Chess is almost the same thing, and if you deny that you are grasping.
whats the objectively correct first 10 moves in chess you fucking mongoloid
Chess is not a game as it does not provide a unique and artistic experience.
What the best computer would do.
you’re dumb games dont need to be “unique and artistic” to be a game fuck off troll
whatever im off to play a game of dota toodles
what would the best computer do? why dont you just go google it if you’re so sure theres an objectively correct first 10 moves you fucking idiot
Games are an extension of book as an artform. If you consider dota or chess “games” you are wrong. They may be called “sports” but very loosely too as they are not physical (physical sports involve thousands of more factors)
Why would I need to google it? If that bot has the highest winrate then it is the current objective best 10 moves.
No your definition of a game is incorrect but I wouldn’t expect any less from someone who’s first language is Arabic
“Current objective best 10 moves” so if its current it means it can change? meaning its not objectively correct and the game is not solved. fuck off, your lack of understanding of simple definitions is annoying me
No my definition is based on 25 years playing games. Life is more than a dictionary.
you’re retarded and your English is shit. go study English more you muslim cuck
I use words in a non literal sense, yes. It’s very easy to deduce what I mean when I repeat it 3 times though. It’s objective in human terms as nothing humans can learn alone is better.
My english is better than yours. You cannot understand simple rhetoric.
When was the last time you’ve read a book?
yeah yeah yeah you’re trolling I know shut the fuck up and go post on /vg/ some more you annoying faggot