basically im on klaze’s side here in that i dont see why the fuck the thread should be intended to be open after hammer but before eod
especially now that we have a bot that prevents miscounts
basically im on klaze’s side here in that i dont see why the fuck the thread should be intended to be open after hammer but before eod
especially now that we have a bot that prevents miscounts
Pusc
2 of 14
The significant difference is that Roragok clearly stated that isn't the case in his game
This is always wrong
So klaze didn’t lock the thread on eod he locked it on hammer
Right
i understand roragok’s intention but do not understand how roragok’s intention is better for game integrity in the slightest, which is what all rules should be instrumental towards
IAFR you didn’t read Roragok’s or my response to your statement
You just posted your opinion, didn’t read for a bit, then posted your opinion again
This is not because of Asoul’s grand post claiming I only looked after my own self-interests and maliciously closed the thread to cheat and gain the system, but because Roragok disagreed with me, and he was the host of the game, so his word is law in this case.
Regardless this thread isn’t about what the rules SHOULD be
We all agree on what the rules SHOULD be. We can set something up to lock threads on hammer
If hammer = stop posting WHY WOULD THE THREAD BEING LOCKED BE A BAD THING IN ANY CASE
It hard stop prevents posting after hammer
IT WAS AN OPEN SETUP (not yelling at rora, just mocking the idea that this addressed my point at all)
Can you clarify? So I’m always wrong by trying to argue this or is posting after hammer always wrong?
Well I know just what you mean
But I could never relate
Cause I don’t know how to seem
Like I care enough to wait
I’m alright
I just forget you all the time
You were right
I should have given you a sign
Talk at all
You never talk enough with me
Love enough
You weren’t in love enough with me
It’s always wrong for mods to delete posts (unless that post just outright breaks the game) because once that post is “exposed” it is now public information
For example: people bantering at EOD and it extends a little beyond EOD
These posts have no game impact but might be tone-readable and thus deleting them is creating information disadvantages for people who didn’t see them
IM ALRIGHT
I JUST FORGET U ALL THE TIIIIME
Deleting posts from a mafia thread is always wrong because those posts might have contained info - the person should be warned or taken action against but now that the posts are made, they are public
I believe what happened was EOD was posted by the host but the thread wasn’t locked.
how do either of your responses address the opinion i posted substantively
Think of how in live poker if a card gets accidentally flipped they don’t hide it under the rug or something
They say “The Ace of Hearts is Exposed” and announce it to everybody so everyone can be on equal footing