sharks and maybe crocodiles. probably some other fish
it's hilarious: you have situation where you're effectively flipping bits and you randomly get back to the input state and these people are "unevolved".
1 Like
Hahaha - that's pretty much what I always thought though, I just have many different ways of saying it to avoid ideology and signalling. I'm sure you know that though.
the size, the number of threads, and the periods before restarts (wiped off the map by god) are able to be optimized.
Pyramids? Restarted. Easter Island? Restarted.
now there's only 5 threads: China, "the WEST", Africa, Russia, and South America.
You could write that in Rust.
the government should be selectively breeding new types of humans each with specific traits and characteristics rather than doing what it is now: the Amerimutt.
Be careful what you wish for, earlier in this thread we discussed a breed of intrinsically homosexual human.
1 Like
What are your thoughts on the main topic of the thread? Legality of Abortion.
Not sure why the thread title was changed.
All children go to heaven, therefore, no child can be born "intrinsically homosexual".
2 Likes
I posted it: it's prima facie evil (especially within the "post scarcity world") and its enshrinement as a "human right" is a societal level cope to allow for the millions of women who have absconded all sense of responsibility to live with the evil they've committed.
Well I am surprised - I thought you were all for the eugenicist angle but I suppose not. You always manage to surprise me.
Have you heard the Western philosophical defenses of abortion? They're laughably bad:
You wake up in the morning and find yourself back to back in bed with an unconscious violinist. A famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They have therefore kidnapped you, and last night the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. [If he is unplugged from you now, he will die; but] in nine months he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you.[4]
I like to come up with arguments and defenses for both sides in my head, instead of reading other peoples'.
1 Like
There's no reason to kill the children when people can just be sterilized/executed once they reach the judicial system.
Well I guess I just never saw the difference - must be a cultural thing.
There is much more noise on sampling the value of some random child compared to someone who has already demonstrated their inability to play nice in society.
Again, suppose it were like this: people-seeds drift about in the air like pollen, and if you open your windows, one may drift in and take root in your carpets or upholstery. You don't want children, so you fix up your windows with fine mesh screens, the very best you can buy. As can happen, however, and on very, very rare occasions does happen, one of the screens is defective; and a seed drifts in and takes root.[11]
Of note, stuff like this which was a defense of abortion in the 70s has been expanded to no-questions asked abortion basically up until the point of birth within America. It's absolutely hilarious.
These arguments arenât even needed, apparently it is a core feature of womenâs rights and democracy in general that the ability to choose to have an abortion is a fundamental concept of freedom, it has been so ingrained that people honestly cannot make the connection between a fetus and a human child. Refer back to posts between me and insom earlier in the thread as insom has the same opinions as 99% of people âon the leftâ to see this in real-time.
When you literally believe that a fetus is not a human being it is a simple thing to agree abortions is a fundamental right as the view is that it is not a child, or not 9 months away from being a child but a parasitic entity that deserves death if the mother chooses so. Trying to point this out as false leads to accusations of either virtue signaling or being disingenuous of your true beliefs (you just hate women and donât want them to have sex, you just want to control women etc etc) because in their minds it is so inconceivable for someone to view a child as a fetus when even 12 years of primary school education essentially teaches you that it is not a human and abortion is a fundamental right
1 Like
There is no need to argue whether killing children is wrong or not, itâs simply wrong. NMA had the most convincing argument for abortion that Iâve ever read but I still cannot simply agree that killing children is ever needed
1 Like
Agreed. It's never needed and should be replaced with proper education, I think the goal of society should be to never have unwanted children.