This is a free speech website
1 Like
Funny how it’s always people on the left leaving websites and calling for censorship based on what people are saying, people like notjones, plasma, or me will argue with these individuals but never call for their outright censorship, nor will we leave a website because a majority do not agree with our viewpoints
I AdvoCare for a working society
You do, when you're censored and forced off of it. That's the crux or the paradox of this forum. The only people who really love it are ones who would clearly be moderated elsewhere
Liberals can’t stand conservatives bringing words together to form coherent sentences on any platform
Yes, me when I see a plasmanation post.
I can post shit like this on 4chan all day
The same places that moderate more often just have higher quality discussion even if they're ruining some of it. 4chan sucks because it's wholly unmoderated and you'll likely find more coherency on some other subversive forum
Like these 19yos, schizos, lobotomized etc spamming derogatory crap wouldn't be tolerated elsewhere, and not just because they're sharing dissenting opinions lol. They're more likely to be inflammatory or intolerant towards others and push back in less than constructive ways. Look at the same group you described and tell me that theyre rational, conceptualize well, behave well (outside of notjones, who is an outlier)
Maybe what I'm describing is the vocal minority but I'm certain that platforms like Twitter have fiduciary interests first and want to retain these users since they bring traffic and retention but have a hard time doing it when these same guys take "free speech" and use it as an opportunity to push something illogical or disingenuous or pointlessly toxic.
Normative IQs in race could be very real but I think it has little to do with the modern plight of African Americans. To try and summarize the issue from that IQ aspect alone seems to me like being reductive, unproductive, misleading, etc. It's kinda understandable why people push back, things are so much more complicated than what I see the average conservative suggesting.
1 Like
A while back we justified Refpsi staying by saying he's clearly so lost in the sauce that there's no way he's going to convert people or radicalize them. I can't say the same is true for this thread. This goes beyond the piss in the piss bucket metaphor used back then -- id just prefer less piss
1 Like
Just providing proper warning if this place became Stormfront 2.0. I can't support that (and I'm sure roragok definitely wouldn't either). there's existing communities for those, and it doesn't feel like real discourse is being facilitated here if it's mostly radicals agreeing with each other and stuffing the hell out of reasonable opinions like "how can you take some average IQ argument and blame the plight of an entire race with well documented history upon it"
I'm partially to blame I'm sure, aggravating the liberal types that were here in the first place before. But I just wanted to balance us on the thin "true discourse" line, as tricky as that can be
1 Like
ban yns
I hope I don't come off as radical - I try my best to be neutral and consider all sides, but it's hard when Insom is so aggressively trite in these "debates".
Most people don't even bother arguing with notjones - he doesn't particularly have any arguments either, it's mostly just rhetoric and a general disdain for the government, something everyone on all sides at all points in history has.
1 Like
You definitely are not. I should clarify, having out of the norm opinions and stances is something I love as I'm not a big fan of modern constructs either.
Everything I focus on is exactly how these groups communicate. Radicalized people aren't really bad for having 'radical opinions' so much as the fact that they generally aren't interested in engaging thoughtfully, learning something from an opposing faction, or reconsidering their viewpoint. You atleast seem to have those bases covered
I think notjones is arguing for his self benefit as an individual in his country, he feels oppressed and stifled, that he can't succeed doing what he wants in this day and age.
It's sad, and may be true. He's just a man with an American Dream - I don't have anything against that, some people such as Yns and Plasma on the other hand are unprincipled and frankly a bit appalling (Sorry), they are indistinguishable from insom.
2 Likes
Yeah, your right. Liberals tend to come from the same place but are generally atleast in support of people who don't look the same as then. I loathe both groups for thinking selfishly first, but I suppose that's just what people do.
Atleast as I see it, if you are so Damn superior, what's the problem in the playing field being leveled. Jews have been dealing with that for ages. Your race will always come out on top according to your beliefs. You're just unnecessarily punching down
The playing field does not give leveled by giving free benefits to other people
A) the "libtard" only exists because it is the path of least resistance. it is a requirement to at least appear to be a libtard to be successful in polite society.
B) the concept of "moderation" is just a bunch of fat, slack-jawed central american, loincloth wearing women in some mud hut village entranced in a circle: each latina checks the others in regards to the behavior around men to keep the cartel controlled market for pussy high.
a contingent of warrior class tutsi, trained and armed by US Green Berets: the concept of applying "moderation" to this group is insane. What does "moderation" offer me as a member of an internet strike force? It's a concept for women.
C) I don't argue with Insom, I don't try to convince him, it's impossible. Insom's beliefs are not based around PWNING facts and logic: they are what is most convenient to him and the global gay he serves. He is an NPC you recruit into your party once you attain enough fame in the world.
I will extend this that I do not intend to "convince" anyone; I do this solely because it is terrorism. It is to bring unease into the eyes of libtard when he sees wrong-think. I am Mullah Omar. I am Osama bin Laden. I am Mohammed Atta. I do this solely for wanton disregard of human life, peace, and prosperity.
D) the quality of a "forum" or "web group" is proportional to the quality of its users. It's not moderation, it's not anything else. It's whether the people are actual people and not hideous subcon morons. Do you think I post this way on lipstickalley? do I post this way on Above Top Secret? obviously not: this is the content you deserve.
E) the more vile, evil, and outright insane the internet is the better. What has happened is that people who are "mentally competent" or "neurotypical" or "functioning" have moved onto the internet as their primary form of entertainment. Global look at your phone all day has opened up a portal to Hell and I have to interact with people, who just don't belong here.
F) of note: "Bantu peoples faults are their own" is a radical opinion but "there is no binary between men and women (especially within the context of the legal system and broader society)" isn't one. There aren't "radical" opinions that are being said here. No one is being "radicalized"; they are "taboo". Everyone knows this to some extent and what your inherent belief in them is moderated solely by your requirement to believe them by Global Gay.
1 Like