It's a lot more than black and white and gay and straight, Jonesz argues for equality in treatment in the absolute sense. He feels like chances to succeed are artificially and arbitrarily affected by federal laws and restrictions.
From that point, his ideology expands into further aggression and anger - it doesn't help that he recently read Nietzsche.
"Being completely emasculated, brainwashed, and humiliated by the state into repeating their lies is just a "challenge"" challenge.
What’s funny is in systems where objective facts are used, people are judged on their merits and not their skin color, minorities end up underrepresented, so therefore in order to tip the scales towards “equality” you have to provide unfair advantages to one group
1 Like
It does, when the oppression and strife felt by a race is by definition lowering their level of potential impact and potentially showcasing "proof of race viability" in your eyes. Blacks in disadvantaged areas here have less opportunity, if they had the same amount and were truly inferior then what's the concern in them having hand outs besides the fact that we can't support it (and remember that we spend soo much in comparison to the scraps these people get)
How come you always met my actions with disapproval then?
qv
Many don't have access to the opportunities to build these merits but would be totally capable of doing so and possibly do an even better job in those positions than the whites (if liberals were correct and we really arent superior)
Correlation does not equal causation
You've reformulated Rawls' idea of "Original Position"; the problem is, the argument of Original Position doesn't integrate over the entirety of time, i.e. those born in the future will have LESS solely because we achieve less technologically now.
1 Like
EVERY BLACK PERSON WILL BE WORSE OFF in the future because we HAMPER OURSELVES TODAY.
If that's true then so be it, why hamper them moreso than we are today if we'd win a race with them anyways?
No the oppression and strife stopped 50 years ago, actually like over 100 years ago at this point, saying that white people not wanting to live with black people is oppression and strife is just insane. Nobody has an inherent right to live around white people, if you move into the neighborhood and start stealing bikes people won’t want to live around you
??? why don't we give all the high paying, intellectual jobs to developmentally disabled people.
It's short term thinking by everyone involved. Nobody wants to person who plants the seeds for their grandchildren's tree, they just want to claim the old trees for themselves.
there are costs to this stuff and you're sacrificing the future for today. that's the core issue.
what are you talking about: the core idea of poperty rights that pass through familial death fixes the issue of short-term time preference.
We need to give more top earning positions and more college admissions to those who are objectively under qualified for those positions, because they are disadvantaged for being black
Why are they disadvantaged? Because they grow up around other black people
It’s literally the dumbest argument I’ve ever heard
We continue to stonewall blacks in many not so apparent ways despite providing obvious affirmative action and a safety net. Its all related to money and these disadvantaged groups do what they can to fill the difference and a reality where they weren't in this position we've put them into as a race would be one where housing prices aren't directly affected by them (and same with white->black)