To argue @yns 's points. Sure it can be IQ, its also a lot to do with culture.
You'd have to speak Arabic to truly understand how Insane and Psychotic Ghaddafi sounded in his last years' speeches. It was honestly quite hilarious.
2 Likes
all the asians i went to school with just cheated on tests and were generally kind of sociopathic and anti-social so it doesn't surprise me that they aren't thriving in management
1 Like
They do, I know many. both sides have echo chambers
within the fields I'm familiar with, the CHINKS perform the majority of the quality research.
IIRC, the entrance-type exams in China (and for what the CCP selects for) are both g-loaded and laboriously long; the idea is to only select for those people who are extremely intelligent and conscientious. I imagine there's some selection effect (especially now, since Chinese universities have reached parity if not eclipsed American institutions) where the foreign born who come over here are already losers who couldn't cut it in China. the CCP's elite party membership probably has highest percentage of people with advanced technical degrees.
if I were to assume why they aren't promoted, it's because all the men are like 5'8".
If you do a cursory comparison between the amount of slant-eyed tech CEOs vs curry eaters within big name companies, I believe the curry eaters dominate. My personal theory is that the caste system within India developed some sort of innate desire for Brahmins to assemble a hordes of lower class servants, which translates well to the American managerial system.
I would wager that "anti-social" is actually some combination of "hereditary innate cultural trait", innate personality differences.
the reasoning to exclude large portions of Asian Americans from Harvard was exactly this: some form of "social score" assessment to deflate their MMR.
as a newfound libtard, arguing for "it's not genetics" is so flat out false: the twin studies proved this, the adoption studies proved this, the sheer mass of actual education statistics. it's so obviously genetics.
one can
A) argue based upon the idea of "restorative justice", "reparations", some sort of social remuneration for past crimes.
B) argue from things akin to a rawlsian original position and solve the problem that arises when you consider time (exponential technological advancement and its effect).
that being said outright disregarding of reality and forging onwards to the further advancement of the bioleninist state is a perfectly valid course of action.
What you describe is like a very reason why it's nurture over nature, a black person might score slightly lower in the same exact environment but is still pretty fucking capable if they're worked like chinese people
Like the entrance exam is laboriously long but if you didn't know this, every school day for chinese kids is laboriously long (like 11-14 hours) so they're trained extensively up until this point
These are not enough, and the conclusions are mostly confirmation bias. These are all mostly 2D studies, single variable - of course it's not feasible to have deeper research done into this, especially with it being so taboo.
I don't believe that there is no genetic factor, but it's one variable in a 100 variable differential equation.
1 Like
no, there are things that are specifically g-loaded and have a barrier; it's like saying you can train for months as a 5'2" man and learn to dunk a basketball.
That's an insane gap compared to what we're talking about
no, it's really not. I will never be an accomplished theoretical physicist: there are topics I am unable to grasp.
1 Like
This is genuinely a paradoxical statement.
One of these things is based on how our mind develops and changes over time, the other one is literally predisposed to hell (assuming that food is plentiful). You could make an argument that these black kids wouldnt survive the chinese school system, but it would very likely be because of societal differences and not a lack of understanding (as I'm certain a black guy raised in China who theoretically didn't experience insane strife or difference would probably be Very Damn Capable, Confucianism strong)
I don't think this "hypothesis" is really applicable to social systems, maybe it's applicable to computer vision identifying flowers and fish - but not how the human brain works or how the aether of culture affects psychological development in black children.
1 Like
They're literally all mentally ill dude lol. They're as fucked up in the head as you are.
that's a good one because "modern" machine learning is just shitty approximations of the neuron structure with the brain.
Well yeah, shitty approximations - maybe like 1% of how an actual brain works? Certainly not above 10%.
I have never heard of a machine learning algorithm having autism.