My supercomputer AI turned out to have Bipolar disorder, sorry guys we're gonna have to go back to the drawing board with this one.
1 Like
and beyond that "aether of culture" more likely socioeconomic strife
I have never heard of a machine learning algorithm having autism.
I don't want to use the S.E. word. Please avoid it.
its the exact word to be used here though
I don't think this "hypothesis" is really applicable to social systems, maybe it's applicable to computer vision identifying flowers and fish - but not how the human brain works or how the aether of culture affects psychological development in black children.
this is just complete nonsense dude. Dimensionality reduction techniques "don't apply to the human genome" "don't apply to educational statistics"
if you're going to argue, at least put up something entertaining. this is just stupid.
It would be more entertaining for me to invoke the name of God. That's just fucking stupid.
It's not even funny. You don't even propose anything.
You could have just named dropped "quantization" or "loss of precision" or something.
just complete unfunny low-effort nonsense.
I'm linking articles to "manifold hypothesis" in a relevant manner about dumbass blacks and you're just dropping the ball out of bounds.
1 Like
I didn't say it doesn't apply to the human genome or education. I literally said that the genetic factors are true and correct, you just cut that part off.
What I'm trying to say is Why do we jump to conclusions with obviously incomplete data? Of course you're right about all the issues with Blacks - including their genetic factors, but there are so many obvious factors that do NOT have any studies done on them, saying "it's just genetics" is simply lacking critical thought and being too simple minded.
I'm sorry it's not entertaining, but it's just what I believe. I am not trying to be funny. Sorry I'm not putting up the best debate, I'm trying to have a conversation with Robert simultaneously and hes saying that I'm ignoring him.
And no I am not referring to "socioeconomic factors"
1 Like
I don't see how "have white people adopt black people" 100x and see if they become an aerospace engineer doesn't account for every single variable in existence. This exact situation has been funded by the government: if it was the case I would have heard about it.
there is a core fundamental issue in that "reducing dimensionality" is critical thinking, it is actually complex minded. The human brain is effective insofar it can reduce to low-dimensional manifolds. There are two opposing ideas here: "dimensionality reduction" is inherently intelligence and it's also unintelligent.
it's the bell curve meme: the left side is "it's blacks" and the right side is "it's blacks" -> the reduction to a low dimensional manifold is both UNINTELLIGENT and INTELLIGENT.
1 Like
this is honestly a ground breaking finding: the bell curve meme exists because both tails use low-dimension datasets with the right tail effectively utilizing dimensionality reduction.
1 Like
How does this work when the black kids inherently know that they are adopted black kids, while maintaining the awareness of black/american culture? There is no way this ever works, it's a non-solution. In fact, no blacks will ever become aerospace engineers - for probably the same reason.
Think of it this way; it's like how advertisements don't work when you know what they're trying to do - awareness of the experiment in of it self changes the result of the "experiment", I made the comparison before but psychology and behavior are like quantum physics.
This makes sense, I don't have much to say against it other than the approximations can be inaccurate at different scales and when drawn over different periods of time. This is un-confirmable, unfortunately - because we don't actually know what we're looking for.
Left Side: Plasma
Right Side: notjones
1 pixel further to the right: Socrates, Nmagane
Human simplify and reduce improperly, they are irrational and don't do this well. There is a reason why virtue signallers and sheep are terrible argument proponents, they're literally regurgitating something they do not understand well. And they make up the majority no matter the race. You are a statistical anomaly, you are smart enough to critically think but even a majority of whites cannot do this.
You could be right that a ML algo could figure out the lowest variables needed but it wouldn't matter because the data set would be inherently flawed as it's not testing like you mention, "whites raising blacks"