No they're not.
It's probably real like COVID. Just not to the extent that it's user to scare people.
It looks like the gays catch it more anyway
It's a plandemic. The "PSYOP" is the mental dissonance of advocating for draconian stay-at-home measures last time but arguing for "civil liberties" in regards to gays being able to "attend" sick fetish events. Gay sex is the most holy rite.
1 Like
If you're so smart why do you and Refpsi reach the same conclusion sir
Cuz Refpsi so smart. Idiot
Refpsi is ground infantry and I am an F-16 fighter pilot; he is the confirmation for what I see on the ground. You on the other hand watch CNN.
2 Likes
of note: refpsi and his brigade seem to have a major issue with friendly fire.
One of many
That right text blurb in the pic you posted doesn't seem that infelligent btw, trickle down economics are a joke
the gist of the right side is that allowing for capital to accumulate (completely natural) through free market processes produces value for everyone that cannot be measured by "how much fed-dollar you have".
i.e. your dumb communist structures of economy wouldn't produce the absolute litany and diversity of pornographic material today which "benefits" everyone regardless of whether I have a few mega-ultra bitcoins instead.
one must see "true free market capitalist process" as something akin to the pursuit of "permanent revolution" in Marxist doctrine.
perhaps it's not permanent revolution: there is some concept of freedom being tied to "being in a continual state of political revolution" and I can't seem to recall who perpetuated it. Or perhaps I'm just making it up.
I see the accumulation as some sort of process like coin flips: the accumulation characteristic of wealth is inherent because there is an absorbing barrier at zero where those who lose enough times can no longer play or enter. Your final state at the end of this process will always be someone with all of the money.
I would argue (with no data or logic) that trickle down economics is entirely true but what "trickled down" went to the working Chinese.
1 Like
That's exactly what I think. We're on the same page, I'm not a communist and only socially liberal lol.
The problem I'm describing is that there is no incentive for these companies and execs making boatloads to help the wealth of those under them. You can see this in the middle class being absolutely boned for reasons you describe -- investments that are guaranteed are too slow of returns for them, the other is a risk that can't be taken without adequate savings which Is that coin flip thing you describe.
Not enough trickles down and it's important because it actually aides capitalism on our end -- these people are much more likely to locally invest and spend and could theoretically create more capital in the future if they had more to work with.
1 Like
American dream is pretty much dead and a reliance on trickle down economics has gotten us there
Accumulation of capital to be reinvested and spent is best for the economy and future capitalistic development. Apple sitting on a trillion bucks is not. There shouldn't be that much fear to taxing on the high end, as these people have the assets to continue coin flipping and insight/information to make better investments than the retail investor. A company shouldn't be taxed to absolution, but a highly successful company can certainly afford it.
PEOPLE WILL RUN WITH THEIR MONEY IUF YOU TAX THEM A LOT THATS THE PROBLEM
This is overlooking that starting a business in the US is garbage for several reasons and the taxes are probably high enough for that. I'd just easily advocate for those with insane capital to give up a bit of it as they naturally continue to accumulate capital anyways, as you said