I agree. I’m not saying they cheat but but no matter how they clear each other, it’s very unfun to play when every post you make gets barraged by 10 posts in return (which also will make town not read the thread, and my posts in return)
That post wasn’t directed to you, if you think it’s positive to lynch town on purpose then you shouldn’t of started a mafia site.
How was Benny 100% town? Because you said so? I definitely agree that Dan was more scummy than Benny, but it was closer to a toss up in my mind because I can’t also be 100% sure about you. Again I bring it back to Wintermute not being sure about Dan and at least Dan was providing somewhat reasonable defense on the second half of D1.
Okay, we’re making progress here. Thanks for not being like dan and wintermute guys.
When you make a post and it gets “barraged by 10 posts in return” (no matter how much of an exaggeration that is) you have the choice of arguing further; or waiting for more players to read it before starting an argument.
In addition, your post would be before that argument regardless - so someone reading through the thread would not skip over it if they were skipping the argument entirely for whatever reason.
I know, and thats why i feel i must Recuse myself from passing any sort of judgement regarding your play. its funny that you townread benny again from the start and never let go there though. I wonder how many times that’s going to keep happening.
Benny was not Mechanically confirmed to be 100% town, but when the general consensus believes he is then it is usually safe to assume that he is, and I am also usually confident in my reads no matter who it is.
An Example would be the slowdive lynch day 3.
Well you won’t get to know if you greybox us and never play with us again.
You’ll have to excuse me if I read your posts with disdain after you guys attempt to throw dirt on my name, if youre familiar with that term. It’s very underhanded and I can’t read those posts and the ones you make now without feeling that theres no point in being serious with you.
The general consensus also believed they’d rather play without Benny - town or not.
How can you accuse others of strawmanning while you yourself strawman? Isn’t taht a little, uh, self-contradictory lols?
Nobody is throwing dirt without evidence. Sorry to break it to you.
You could try to defend yourself instead of throwing a tantrum.
I don’t strawman.
reading what somebody said out of context is not evidence – it is reaching. I’d prefer if you kept reaching away from me and just kept it to you and benny, thanks.
For what reason? There is objective truth in someone being a certain role in the game, but is there truth in benny being a so-called “ruiner”?
Saying that something is out of context doesn't work if there is no context provided.
I thought your push on epok was far weaker than you thought it was. That’s enough to give you both scum points.
Alright - that is an in game mistake, there is no denying that. But benny and I (and also others) had many posts with detailed reasons as to why we thought epok was mafia. He never defended himself, and never tried to change his playstyle from his usual mafia playstyle - and that made me more confident that he was scum at the time.
If that is what you call game ruining then town lynching Yns on the final day is also ruining?
Given that you both are town to me in the null scenario that you both confirm each other town, I thought you both did a good job of ruining D1 for town.
Again: Ruining how? Have you read the two posts I made above in response to you earlier?
No offense but I just think you (and most other players getting angry over this situation) are just inexperienced.