Most of my friends who like to argue for the sake of arguing refuse to take bets.
Or it's because it's fucking irrelevant to the point of the conversation in the slightest. Hbotz just doesn't understand at all any of the topics at hand so he brings up random shit he thinks has some relation
Maybe people who have been conditioned to be intellectually masturbatory don't like when their ideas are challenged in the world of concrete & scraped knees
if its not relevant you could just humor me and answer the question.
maybe computers could in principle beat humans at mathematical research, while still being unable to do real math since real math requires access to metaphysical structures? you could just say so.
Hey, still waiting on that citation on hedge funds. You don't know anything about the subject matter of this conversation. You're just as uninformed as hbotz and have no vantage point to make a judgment regarding the discussion.
1 Like
Or... what seems to be highlighted here, is that this entire thread was in pursuit of whether or not modern philosophy supports this âbetâ about agi
Which is... kind of funny but also sad and also I fucking told you so.
I mean this sounds like the most scathing description of hbotz yet
Jeez.
Hbotz offered the bet so I don't think he's afraid to get his knees skinned. He's the real deal.
Yeah the bet has nothing to do with it. How can I help you understand that if the entire discussion is about agi, driven by someone who literally refuses to read critical source materials and engages people in bad faith to feed a confirmation bias (he canât be proven wrong if he doesnât invest in the material)
Itâs just lame.
Ewiz can be his own brand of lame for blowing up and being hostile.
But that doesnât negate the reality that hbotz is doing something scummy and treating others as if he is not (patronizing)
Ewiz doesn't know more about AGI dude
Just like he doesn't know more about the nature of consciousness just because he has a low-level degree in math and marxism and has read some books
Anybody who claims to know anything about AGI is by definition a pseudointellectual armchair internet masturbator
The people who could talk about this stuff all have PhDs and even they are speaking theoretically and not practically (and are therefore wankers like the rest)
WTF is AGI?
Adjusted gross income? What are we talking about here?
1 Like
You expose yourself every time you argue with me. Still waiting to see a source saying persistent connection clients should keep resending requests when there's no response from the host. Still waiting to see data that EW index funds perform with a high correlation to HFs. Still waiting to see a source that HFs aren't a minimal risk investment strategy.
The fact is you're jealous. You want to come off as smart, but I make you look like shit any time you step up. Because you don't know a fucking thing.
Keep talking trash while never standing up a real argument, though. I'm sure you've got some very prestigious publications
Dota. it's agility
Artificial general intelligence
I claimed that our current AI/ML frameworks will never get us AGI. Which is pretty much the leading opinion in the field. Hbotz just can't read.
Isnât that in some ways my point?
Like, theyâre discussing metaphysics, and hbotz is particularly concerned with metaphysics and how it applies to consciousness. Into whether or not agi developing consciousness is attainable
What ewiz is talking about is how modern philosophy/philosophy of science/mathematics view these ideas(letâs put a broad tag on this)
But hbotz has a clear agenda and doesnât care for the actual fields heâs critiquing. (This means heâs relatively unstudied and doesnât follow the forms in practice)
Asoul knows it's absurd to make claims like "most of math is wrong," without being able to point to a specific error in a fundamental proof. He's just using this as his chance to do the same shit he always does. And throw in some jabs at me with no substance because I humiliated him the other day