To expand on the previous post I made, blacks proportionally are on welfare more and whites are underrepresented compared to overall % of population. This is because of cultural attitudes towards welfare in general, among black people or other minority groups besides Asians it is completely normal to stay on welfare for as long as possible and it is very common for black people to get on food stamps as soon as they graduate high school and start working.
Compare this to white people, or yourself, if you say lost your job and were unable to find work for awhile, you were burning through your savings, you may get on social assistance but you likely would exhaust almost every other option and feel a sense of shame of having to use welfare, you would probably quietly take your food stamps or whatever else and work towards finding a job and getting off of welfare as soon as you could. Your family and friends would likely understand that you were going through a rough time in your life and needed the help, now imagine you just stayed on welfare for years, 2, 3, 4 years, your friends and family would likely be asking if you were physically disabled or if something was wrong with you, they would probably shame you at a certain point for being on it for so long because it is looked at as low class and taking advantage of a system out of laziness (unless you were disabled, like legitimately disabled).
Compare this with black people who get on food stamps at a young age and will openly sell their food stamps on Facebook or other places for .50 cents on the dollar, who will openly talk with themselves and their family about strategies to maximize welfare benefits, and will stay on welfare for years with no shame from peers or family members as many of them are on welfare as well and it is normalized. So you just have a core group of black people (despite making up 13% of the population they account for 24% of welfare recipients) who are on welfare indefinitely, constantly in and out of work, have an inability to obtain high paying jobs due to a lack of skills, education and in many cases just simply cognitive ability and this is what almost a quarter of the welfare spending is going to.
What Canadians and Europeans don’t realize about America is that we have a legitimate underclass that is a significant part of our population that is a net loss economically to anything they take part in, they literally do not pay enough taxes over their lifetime to pay for all the benefits they receive, of course there are whites like this as well but it is less than their total % of the population meaning the white people who actually work balance out the ones who don’t.
There’s not enough properties to provide free housing to welfare people anyways due to the demand, they operate off a lottery system and it takes years to get into section 8 housing
Thought: If Neitzsche was alive in the 21st century, he would define his Ubermensch as someone who follows "12 rules for life" and "12 more rules for life".
It's not that there isn't. There isn't enough that are forced to comply to building codes. You can make villages with little 5'x8' huts that have a lock and some communal shower.
Government wont build that. That's what most of these people need. Not fucking hotel type rooms
As White populations decline its simply bizzare to say that White countries have a "housing problem"
My house is more than 100 years old and it's easily going to stand for 200 more unless the robberment decides to tear it down and build pods where it stood
I'm aware it's a bigger country with more problems. My point was that the whole ebt/snap system in which people aren't given money, they are given coupons to buy pre approved items doesn't accomplish what people think it does (ie force people to buy milk instead of cigarettes). US spends more per capita on social services for inferior service delivery. Idk maybe it's all by design and intended to be a bad system to try to incentivize people to get off it but that obviously will never work and just needlessly victimizes poor people
It's definitely not intended, atleast the best system does what you describe and encourages people to break dependence and bad spending habits. A lot of our social assistance programs suffer from this
We have a housing problem and it's self evident in the housing market where prices just continue to rise. If demand for housing was low prices would stagnate or lower. Building charity homes isn't cheap, areas are disincentivized to do it when it lowers nearby house value, and it doesn't really solve the problem if it's not easy for them to find employment nearby.
