No, the title sucked. I think this one has a more aesthetic look plus it’s not totally ruining the sensation like some people seem to think. Not to mention I last a little longer in bed with it.
then you make the thread next time hmph!
Aesthetic look? Well I think that it’s WORSE aesthetically.
1 Like
this thread made great content, i just want people to know waht the content is about if theyre lookin at the topic list 
do NOT use aesthetic as some sort of catch-all adjective. I hate that
I am just leaving all my threat titles blank from now on and waiting for the aesthetic gods to bless my thread.
yeah i was wrong to imply that i had some osrt of aesthetic understanding, i believe we’ll have to chopper in yns to get the final verdict
I’m not mad at you but mad at the movement that calls their aesthetic “aesthetic”. It’s like commenting on food and saying it has flavor. It’s flavor food. No fucking shit
I think there is a linguistic misstep here. Ill think about it later
are circumcized penises aesthetic?
- yes
- no
- aesthetic isnt the right word, scrumptious is
0 voters
I know people who say certain things are “aesthetic”, not to say they are aesthetically pleasing or executed by an aesthete, but to say they’re faux 80’s and 90’s vaporwave aesthetic.
Thats just an internet meme
Yeah but that is a very normal use of language.
It isn’t. It’s an adjective you have to include with something else, it’s not a standalone state adjective like hot, cold, etc.
If they’re not the internet reddit meme type then they obviously they just mean “aesthetically pleasing”
Demanding people to use words prescriptively is futile.
Don’t use sub optimal grammar on nadota please
Until they meet my demands, the killings will continue.
It is like being upset at someone walking or sleeping
:/
I don’t think it’s weird to be mad at someone being verbose and incorrect at the same time.
There was a (I think) autistic kid who’d preface sentences with “theoretically” all the time and it was such an annoying pattern of speech.